In Reply to: Re: amplifier's Damping-Factor? posted by Thorsten on September 14, 1999 at 07:33:28:
... SPL doesn't dip under HFs, LFs, & XOs where Z inceases. In that respect it performs almost like a current-source w/o the enormous output-Z that obtliterates likelike dynamics. However, it does get dull & strained albeit articulate under high-Z frequencies like generic tubes, whereas nominal-Z level frequencies remain open & effortless, but equalizes the speaker's efficiency. It goes much higher & modestly lower than traditional much more expensive amplifier designs.what I don't like is the comb-filtering that only becomes audible during transitional frequencies that exhibit modestly large-Z ( around 14 ohms between the two distinctively different behaviors. It sounds as if the dual signals exhibit differential processing times that destructively clash.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- the apsects of KRELL that I want ... - Mart 09/14/9920:28:47 09/14/99 (7)
- Re: the apsects of KRELL that I want ... - Thorsten 03:16:38 09/15/99 (6)
- the KRELL did extend both higher & lower than ... - Mart 06:19:44 09/15/99 (5)
- Re: the KRELL did extend both higher & lower than ... - Thorsten 10:09:23 09/15/99 (4)
- BTW, what $$$ figures are we talking? __ (nt - Mart 10:52:03 09/15/99 (0)
- I love the PM-17 sound ... - Mart 10:50:39 09/15/99 (2)
- Re: I love the PM-17 sound ... - Thorsten 12:09:12 09/15/99 (1)
- I was thinking of around $500/channel _(nt - Mart 19:24:16 09/15/99 (0)