Bose proves 2 things - chuckd55

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - The Case Against Bose (long) - Dalancroft 10:14:36 09/10/02 (83)

You are ignoring the psychological aspect - Fred S 07:50:54 09/12/02 (1)

That's exactly what I did with a friend -- he A-B'd against Bose, and . . . - Dalancroft 08:33:09 09/12/02 (0)

Re: The Case Against Bose (long) - Red Pill 02:14:43 09/12/02 (2)

Dude, I've copped to that mistake like 5 times already - Dalancroft 08:34:29 09/12/02 (1)

I glanced - Red Pill 04:05:37 09/16/02 (0)

Bose proves 2 things - chuckd55 09/11/0221:30:21 09/11/02 (0)

Re: The Case Against Bose (long) - Atexanathome 18:22:17 09/11/02 (0)

Bose is great! Well, they're OK for what they are.... - alext 14:59:39 09/11/02 (1)

Bose,systems, especially with Cubes, really are 'orrible. - Dave VH 20:35:29 09/11/02 (0)

Thanks to all respondents & readers -- two more thoughts - Dalancroft 10:28:20 09/11/02 (2)

Re: Thanks to all respondents & readers -- two more thoughts - Steve Eddy 12:12:51 09/11/02 (1)

Yes -- WATCH OUT FOR THAT BUS!!! Whew, close one. - Dalancroft 12:27:52 09/11/02 (0)

Anyone mention the "T" word yet? (nt) - dpy 07:44:02 09/11/02 (0)

Bose is good at what it does... - dado5 07:31:28 09/11/02 (2)

In other words, elevator music - Dalancroft 10:15:37 09/11/02 (1)

That's about the size of it. - dado5 11:07:57 09/11/02 (0)

Re: The Case Against Bose (long) - SLL 03:35:17 09/11/02 (0)

Re: The Case Against Bose (long) - haroo 23:14:24 09/10/02 (0)

Check your math - Norm Strong 23:00:23 09/10/02 (1)

Yes, there are two other posts below -- MEA CULPA! - Dalancroft 10:16:30 09/11/02 (0)

Kool Aid anyone? - Clink 21:18:17 09/10/02 (0)

Re: The Case Against Bose (long) - Tom Brennan 19:47:27 09/10/02 (2)

Re: The Case Against Bose (long) - Todd Krieger 22:24:40 09/10/02 (1)

Re: The Case Against Bose (long) - Tom Brennan 03:41:32 09/11/02 (0)

This is why I don't like Bose... - audiogatorjim 18:38:10 09/10/02 (0)

Munch's "Scream" in Audio. - gd 17:09:54 09/10/02 (0)

So What? - AudioDwebe 16:57:44 09/10/02 (3)

Took me all of 15 minutes - Dalancroft 10:23:23 09/11/02 (0)

Re: don't buy 'em then....NT - tuneman 09:03:44 09/11/02 (0)

That's Kind of How I Feel... - Todd Krieger 23:35:24 09/10/02 (0)

Thanks, Dalancroft. Good work. - brewthunda 16:42:28 09/10/02 (1)

Thanks! - Dalancroft 10:24:52 09/11/02 (0)

B.O.S.E. = Better off somewhere else - Brian Hueske 15:18:00 09/10/02 (8)

Re: B.O.S.E. = Buy Other Stereo Equipment NT - michael w 03:55:26 09/12/02 (0)

Re: B.O.S.E. = Better off somewhere else - sam9 16:29:01 09/10/02 (3)

Ever seen Bose Pro gear? - Brian Hueske 07:20:33 09/11/02 (2)

Re: Ever seen Bose Pro gear? - Clink 10:51:03 09/11/02 (0)

You tell 'em Brian! - Dalancroft 10:14:32 09/11/02 (0)

Thanks for the support. Will look into Totem Dreamcatcher 5.1. - Dalancroft 15:40:08 09/10/02 (2)

A little large & expensive by comparison - Dalancroft 15:47:57 09/10/02 (1)

The picture is a little misleading - Brian Hueske 07:24:05 09/11/02 (0)

Re: The Case Against Bose (long) - G.Nye 14:53:50 09/10/02 (0)

Why the crusade? - sam9 14:42:05 09/10/02 (0)

Bose overcharges for miniturization, if you don't require it... - NYNick 14:32:26 09/10/02 (0)

Re: The Case Against Bose (long) - peter@petercawson.com 14:05:04 09/10/02 (8)

Agreed, but a tough walk to walk....... - Sordidman 14:43:45 09/10/02 (6)

funny I thought this was Audio forum - Ponce 15:16:23 09/10/02 (2)

Hey, I really qualified my statements..... - Sordidman 16:38:44 09/10/02 (1)

Re: Hey, I really qualified my statements..... - Ponce 13:18:17 09/11/02 (0)

My goal was as a public service message - Dalancroft 14:58:37 09/10/02 (2)

Re: My goal was as a public service message - peter@petercawson.com 16:00:34 09/10/02 (1)

As audiophiles (or, in my case, an enthusiast) isn't it our job to hold a candle to the darkness??? - Dalancroft 10:31:06 09/11/02 (0)

Agreed! No TV here! (nt) - NYNick 14:25:06 09/10/02 (0)

Re: The Case Against Bose (long) - Joe Blow 12:35:03 09/10/02 (0)

Re: The Case Against Bose (long) - mark111 11:57:04 09/10/02 (0)

compared to what theory.. - Ponce 11:52:52 09/10/02 (6)

Re: compared to what theory.. - Les Lammers 13:55:30 09/10/02 (1)

remember the "Curtis Mathis" brand TV's - Ponce 15:03:09 09/10/02 (0)

Re: compared to what theory.. - kentaja@yahoo.com 12:28:24 09/10/02 (3)

Re: compared to what theory.. - Les Lammers 13:59:14 09/10/02 (0)

Not to mention Budweiser, Big Macs, the Gap . . . - Dalancroft 13:11:01 09/10/02 (1)

I call this the "BBM&M" syndrome - Big Dave 18:27:01 09/11/02 (0)

What planet are you from... - Frosty 11:14:33 09/10/02 (3)

Wavelength at 9" is about 1.5 kHz - Big Dave 12:13:43 09/10/02 (1)

Mea culpa -- as I said, I'm no mathematician - Dalancroft 13:12:33 09/10/02 (0)

Further proof I'm no mathematician - Dalancroft 11:31:26 09/10/02 (0)

Re: The Case Against Bose (long) - RAYDOG 10:46:01 09/10/02 (4)

A thousand bucks for $80-90 in parts & materials? C'mon! - Dalancroft 11:32:58 09/10/02 (2)

Re: A thousand bucks for $80-90 in parts & materials? C'mon! - sam9 14:47:01 09/10/02 (0)

Re: A thousand bucks for $80-90 in parts & materials? C'mon! - RAYDOG 11:48:34 09/10/02 (0)

Re: The Case Against Bose (long) - gary 11:13:17 09/10/02 (0)

Re: The Case Against Bose (long) - Don T 10:29:48 09/10/02 (11)

Bose and Demographics - Todd Krieger 17:13:15 09/10/02 (1)

Re: Bose and Demographics - Don T 08:27:48 09/11/02 (0)

Re: The Case Against Bose (long) - Les Lammers 11:01:41 09/10/02 (8)

Re: The Case Against Bose (long) - Les Lammers 13:42:17 09/10/02 (0)

If you're a movie buff . . . - Dalancroft 11:51:08 09/10/02 (5)

Your right, I wouldn't want a 57" set either... - DaveInVA 14:04:32 09/10/02 (0)

I wouldn't give you $10 for it - Dave Pogue 12:48:22 09/10/02 (3)

What are YOU watching? - Dalancroft 13:11:37 09/10/02 (2)

Glowing tubes - Dave Pogue 05:14:08 09/11/02 (1)

I do both -- almost exactly 50/50 - Dalancroft 10:34:32 09/11/02 (0)

well said (nt) - Ponce 11:41:16 09/10/02 (0)

Follow Ups

Bose proves 2 things - chuckd55 09/11/0221:30:21 09/11/02 (0)