That was a nice read, thanks [nt] - Ted Smith

General Asylum

General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories.

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - A question for Mr. John Curl - Jerry Parker 08:13:41 08/4/02 (51)

Re: A question for Mr. John Curl - rtbarr 21:38:00 08/5/02 (1)

That was a nice read, thanks [nt] - Ted Smith 08/5/0222:16:52 08/5/02 (0)

One Aspect (long) - Jon Risch 20:34:13 08/5/02 (0)

Think about it this way..... - Adi 10:52:04 08/5/02 (0)

Re: A question for Mr. John Curl - Jitter_by_Coffee 05:08:31 08/5/02 (0)

If a stranger calls you "Mr." on the net... - suits_me 23:08:42 08/4/02 (0)

Re: OK, guys... - Jerry Parker 21:59:29 08/4/02 (18)

NO scientific basis - Adi 11:20:45 08/5/02 (0)

Are you serious?? - BrassMonkey 09:20:02 08/5/02 (1)

Re: Are you serious?? - Analog Scott 17:45:08 08/5/02 (0)

Here's my advice. - orpheus 08:11:26 08/5/02 (2)

Re: Here's my advice. - Jerry Parker 13:52:03 08/5/02 (1)

Re: Here's my advice. - orpheus 09:29:54 08/6/02 (0)

Re: OK, guys... - john curl 22:44:58 08/4/02 (11)

Re: I have listened to high end systems! - Jerry Parker 10:08:58 08/5/02 (10)

Re: I have listened to high end systems! - john curl 10:38:21 08/5/02 (9)

Re: I have listened to high end systems! - Adi 11:27:37 08/5/02 (8)

Re: No, that is incorrect - Jerry Parker 13:31:01 08/5/02 (7)

Re: No, that is incorrect - cdb 19:36:55 08/8/02 (1)

Re: No, that is incorrect - Jerry Parker 20:33:54 08/8/02 (0)

Re: No, that is incorrect - Analog Scott 17:55:05 08/5/02 (0)

Re: No, that is incorrect - john curl 16:06:07 08/5/02 (2)

Shame on you John - Adi 21:53:56 08/5/02 (1)

Re: Grow Up - Jerry Parker 20:29:09 08/8/02 (0)

Lucky you - Bruce from DC 14:38:20 08/5/02 (0)

So Jerry, now do you understand? - rupertdacat 19:51:05 08/4/02 (1)

Re: So Jerry, now do you understand? - Dave-A 21:16:14 08/4/02 (0)

Re: A question for Mr. John Curl - Analog Scott 12:02:57 08/4/02 (0)

Re: A question for Mr. John Curl - rtbarr 11:02:16 08/4/02 (3)

Thanks [nt] - Ted Smith 13:02:21 08/4/02 (0)

Great Link! - wheezer 12:32:42 08/4/02 (0)

Re: A question for Mr. John Curl - john curl 11:41:56 08/4/02 (0)

Re: A question for Mr. John Curl - john curl 11:00:11 08/4/02 (18)

Well, I would assume... - Jerry Parker 23:29:26 08/4/02 (17)

Re: Well, I would assume... - Analog Scott 17:57:42 08/5/02 (1)

Re: Well, I would assume... - Jerry Parker 18:12:21 08/5/02 (0)

Re: Well, I would assume... - john curl 09:19:20 08/5/02 (3)

Re: Well, I would assume... - Jerry Parker 10:16:13 08/5/02 (2)

Re: Well, I would assume... - Analog Scott 18:06:32 08/5/02 (0)

Re: Well, I would assume... - john curl 10:43:39 08/5/02 (0)

Test methods... - Estes 05:35:43 08/5/02 (2)

Re: Well then... - Jerry Parker 07:40:15 08/5/02 (1)

Re: Well then... - jeff mai 18:20:59 08/5/02 (0)

There are more conditions on this challenge... - jeff mai 02:58:00 08/5/02 (7)

Re: Well.... - Jerry Parker 07:48:46 08/5/02 (6)

Re: Well.... - jeff mai 16:31:34 08/5/02 (0)

Re: Well.... - caa 13:27:01 08/5/02 (4)

Re: Compromises - Jerry Parker 14:29:57 08/5/02 (3)

Re: Compromises - Analog Scott 18:13:20 08/5/02 (0)

Re: Compromises - caa 16:26:03 08/5/02 (0)

Re: Compromises - john curl 16:20:04 08/5/02 (0)

Follow Ups

That was a nice read, thanks [nt] - Ted Smith 08/5/0222:16:52 08/5/02 (0)