For you, perhaps, Richard. - markrohr

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - That old devil "Wood Effect" - M3 lover 11:02:31 08/18/05 (54)

Whaddya mean, my system sucks? - M3 lover 00:07:42 08/20/05 (3)

Welcome to the world of understanding this thing. nt - clarkjohnsen 09:35:47 08/20/05 (0)

A most excellent summary, thanks. nt - markrohr 08:29:39 08/20/05 (0)

Re: Whaddya mean, my system sucks? - jea48 07:15:35 08/20/05 (0)

Re: That old devil "Wood Effect" - jea48 14:45:33 08/19/05 (0)

Re: That old devil "Wood Effect" - Chris_F 04:05:04 08/19/05 (18)

Actually, it ain't that simple... - Silver Eared John 15:51:29 08/19/05 (0)

Re: That old devil "Wood Effect" - risabet 13:10:07 08/19/05 (3)

Re: That old devil "Wood Effect" - andyr 16:16:15 08/19/05 (2)

Re: That old devil "Wood Effect" - risabet 21:08:00 08/19/05 (1)

Thanks, risabet ... - andyr 21:56:52 08/19/05 (0)

New to "absolute polarity"... - Chris_F 10:09:07 08/19/05 (4)

Re: New to "absolute polarity"... - markrohr 11:31:23 08/19/05 (3)

Sounds like a good feature for a preamp - Chris_F 18:23:36 08/19/05 (2)

Audio Research has one... - tunenut 16:47:27 08/20/05 (0)

Quite right, but we're probably a bunch of goofballs, anyway. ;-) nt - markrohr 08:30:43 08/20/05 (0)

Been done. Blind tests and everything. It's real. - markrohr 07:00:09 08/19/05 (7)

Yup, I posted a reference to DBT done by Stanley Lipshitz some weeks ago. nt - JimL 09:54:07 08/19/05 (0)

Very rare that absolute phase is audible with commercial recordings - Richard BassNut Greene 07:13:01 08/19/05 (5)

Example....... - jea48 14:49:02 08/20/05 (1)

Re: Example....... - john curl 23:00:15 08/20/05 (0)

For you, perhaps, Richard. - markrohr 08/19/0509:12:18 08/19/05 (0)

That's only if you listen to crapola "music". nt - clarkjohnsen 08:13:12 08/19/05 (1)

Gee, I hear it readily on crapola music, too. ;-) - markrohr 09:12:55 08/19/05 (0)

Re: That old devil "Wood Effect" - mike_h 11:57:23 08/18/05 (29)

Re: That old devil "Wood Effect" - jea48 14:33:32 08/19/05 (3)

That measures ony *relative* polarity, not *Absolute* polarity. nt - clarkjohnsen 09:27:06 08/20/05 (1)

Re: True, but, - jea48 14:17:42 08/20/05 (0)

Re: That old devil "Wood Effect" - jea48 15:07:25 08/19/05 (0)

Re: That old devil "Wood Effect" - markrohr 13:07:47 08/18/05 (24)

Polarity standards do exist and should apply - Jacques 00:53:52 08/19/05 (3)

An electrical standard is not enough. - clarkjohnsen 08:17:57 08/19/05 (1)

Seems it is - Jacques 11:50:30 08/20/05 (0)

I should have been clearer. - markrohr 06:56:04 08/19/05 (0)

Re: That old devil "Wood Effect" - mike_h 13:17:53 08/18/05 (19)

Re: That old devil "Wood Effect" - markrohr 15:27:59 08/18/05 (2)

Quite right, except about CDs. Mine are split. - clarkjohnsen 08:19:23 08/19/05 (1)

That's why I said my results were not necessarily transferrable. - markrohr 09:16:28 08/19/05 (0)

Re: That old devil "Wood Effect" - andyr 14:19:36 08/18/05 (15)

Re: That old devil "Wood Effect" - Doc Gaw 10:45:41 08/19/05 (9)

"Obviously the old horn mechanical systems were always in correct polarity." And you know that, how?... nt - clarkjohnsen 09:37:35 08/20/05 (0)

Hear hear! - andyr 15:16:07 08/19/05 (7)

have I earned an honorable mention yet? _ (nt) - Mart 10:07:56 08/21/05 (1)

Har har har ... - andyr 14:29:33 08/21/05 (0)

"No single person in the history of audiophilia has ruined more people's lives than Clark Johnsen!!" - clarkjohnsen 09:39:43 08/20/05 (4)

There was a "smiley" after my comment, Clark. - andyr 17:17:41 08/20/05 (3)

No Andy there were OTHERS,and WELL before Mr Johnsen. - Timbo in Oz 22:59:08 08/21/05 (2)

Well I did say I had posted a Smiley! ... - andyr 05:14:02 08/22/05 (1)

Re: Well I did say I had posted a Smiley! ... - Timbo in Oz 15:37:38 08/22/05 (0)

Re: That old devil "Wood Effect" - markrohr 15:30:58 08/18/05 (4)

Re: That old devil "Wood Effect" - andyr 15:47:42 08/18/05 (3)

"That Cardas test disc with 'In polarity' and 'Out of polarity' tracks." - clarkjohnsen 08:25:23 08/19/05 (0)

I understand . . . finally! ;-) - markrohr 06:39:08 08/19/05 (1)

Re: I understand . . . finally! ;-) - mitsumoto 06:20:52 08/20/05 (0)

Follow Ups

For you, perhaps, Richard. - markrohr 08/19/0509:12:18 08/19/05 (0)