RE: If someone tried to enter...

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - "What does 'accurate' even mean in audio?" - Analog Scott 13:36:59 02/27/24 (72)

RE: "What does 'accurate' even mean in audio?" - Brad225 16:34:41 03/13/24 (0)

"JJ"..... - Todd Krieger 12:25:01 03/11/24 (0)

He's a scientist, not an audiophile...(nt) - mkuller 13:58:42 03/7/24 (8)

Absolute nonsense - Analog Scott 08:09:18 03/10/24 (7)

Would an serious audiophile invent MP3? (nt) - mkuller 09:18:33 03/10/24 (6)

What a dumb question - Analog Scott 10:34:35 03/10/24 (5)

If someone tried to enter... - mkuller 12:01:10 03/10/24 (4)

RE: If someone tried to enter... - Analog Scott 03/10/2417:03:12 03/10/24 (3)

So here's what he said... - mkuller 17:06:29 03/10/24 (2)

Your point? - Analog Scott 19:47:21 03/10/24 (1)

You are correct. - mkuller 21:51:41 03/10/24 (0)

So, we might need a new word (or two) "in audio" ? - peppy m. 17:10:52 03/6/24 (0)

RE: "What does 'accurate' even mean in audio?" - MaggiesAndCats 06:20:08 03/1/24 (0)

For starters...-20Hz-20kHz, +/- 3dB...- - Chris Garrett 20:57:17 02/29/24 (0)

Good ol' JJ.... - Rod M 11:14:11 02/29/24 (1)

Never understood why - E-Stat 18:58:29 02/29/24 (0)

I think it means reproduction of the input signal - tomservo 10:37:11 02/28/24 (6)

RE: I think it means reproduction of the input signal - Tuckers 19:30:05 03/10/24 (0)

Simple as that ... except some audiophiles don't really want accuracy - Feanor 03:51:19 03/1/24 (1)

RE: Simple as that ... except some audiophiles don't really want accuracy - Rich H v2 15:32:21 03/6/24 (0)

Exactly! What comes out should be identical to what goes in, in all significant parameters - Brian H P 15:48:55 02/28/24 (2)

The transducer paradox - Analog Scott 16:34:25 02/28/24 (1)

RE: The transducer paradox - tomservo 09:14:05 02/29/24 (0)

What's the context? Accuracy of 'head tracking' ? - AbeCollins 08:43:03 02/28/24 (1)

Sorry, I did not realize the link starts in the middle of the lecture - Analog Scott 09:41:50 02/28/24 (0)

"Accurate" (in audio) might mean different things, depending on the *type* of listening you do. - peppy m. 07:01:45 02/28/24 (4)

RE: "Accurate" (in audio) might mean different things, depending on the *type* of listening you do. - Tom Brennan 07:55:59 02/28/24 (3)

RE: "Accurate" (in audio) might mean different things, depending on the *type* of listening you do. - Analog Scott 09:44:45 02/28/24 (0)

RE: "IME people think their preference, whatever it might be, is accurate." - peppy m. 08:01:27 02/28/24 (1)

Important Distinction - Inmate51 09:04:20 02/28/24 (0)

What does 'accurate' even mean? - Inmate51 19:23:55 02/27/24 (9)

Somehow you got the question wrong even though it's clearly stated in the header - Analog Scott 19:35:17 02/27/24 (8)

No, I Didn't Get It Wrong - Inmate51 13:52:30 02/28/24 (2)

Based on your own reference you got it even more wrong - Analog Scott 15:03:03 02/28/24 (1)

In addition to being an A#1 pedantic, 51 has been known... - musetap 15:56:30 02/28/24 (0)

"Accurate" definition, regardless of the subject matter : - Story 01:29:29 02/28/24 (4)

No kidding, but it wasn't the subject - Analog Scott 02:04:51 02/28/24 (3)

Subject - Audio....Accurate - Adjective - Story 03:18:32 02/28/24 (2)

Thank you for reminding me why I hate audiophiles nt - Analog Scott 04:09:56 02/28/24 (1)

Thank you for reminding me why I don't like people much /nt - Story 04:14:54 02/28/24 (0)

More importantly - E-Stat 14:33:32 02/27/24 (31)

RE: More importantly - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 18:25:46 02/27/24 (30)

Time to listen again - E-Stat 18:52:37 02/27/24 (28)

You made it to 7:40! - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 19:16:04 02/27/24 (2)

At what time stamp does he contradict himself? -nt - E-Stat 06:05:22 02/28/24 (1)

RE: At what time stamp does he contradict himself? -nt - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 09:45:40 02/28/24 (0)

RE: Time to listen again - Analog Scott 19:05:54 02/27/24 (24)

I followed the part - E-Stat 06:04:45 02/28/24 (23)

RE: I followed the part - Analog Scott 17:06:18 02/28/24 (18)

To each his own - E-Stat 09:03:34 02/29/24 (15)

RE: To each his own - dgaapc7 17:07:57 02/29/24 (10)

Interesting - Analog Scott 17:31:14 02/29/24 (9)

RE: Interesting - Inmate51 20:10:47 02/29/24 (8)

Yes - E-Stat 08:16:46 03/1/24 (2)

RE: Yes - regmac 11:39:14 03/11/24 (1)

RE: Yes - Inmate51 12:02:14 03/11/24 (0)

RE: Interesting - Analog Scott 21:06:06 02/29/24 (4)

RE: Interesting - Inmate51 21:14:01 02/29/24 (3)

RE: Interesting - Analog Scott 21:31:01 02/29/24 (2)

RE: Interesting - Inmate51 22:04:42 03/2/24 (1)

RE: Interesting - Analog Scott 23:03:02 03/2/24 (0)

RE: To each his own - Analog Scott 11:45:24 02/29/24 (3)

RE: To each his own - regmac 06:37:53 03/12/24 (0)

It's a good thing - E-Stat 16:01:32 02/29/24 (1)

RE: It's a good thing - Analog Scott 17:09:46 02/29/24 (0)

RE: I followed the part - Inmate51 18:05:37 02/28/24 (1)

RE: I followed the part - Analog Scott 18:48:21 02/28/24 (0)

"live, unamplified music ". Well that eliminates 85% off music and venues - Edp 10:30:48 02/28/24 (3)

RE: "live, unamplified music ". Well that eliminates 85% off music and venues - Tre' 20:51:34 02/29/24 (1)

RE: "live, unamplified music ". Well that eliminates 85% off music and venues - Analog Scott 23:17:10 02/29/24 (0)

Exactly - E-Stat 10:56:39 02/28/24 (0)

And they would both be making assertions that are...-...-wait for it...-...-...-...-...-...-...- - Analog Scott 18:29:10 02/27/24 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: If someone tried to enter... - Analog Scott 03/10/2417:03:12 03/10/24 (3)

So here's what he said... - mkuller 17:06:29 03/10/24 (2)

Your point? - Analog Scott 19:47:21 03/10/24 (1)

You are correct. - mkuller 21:51:41 03/10/24 (0)

Post a Message!