In Reply to: RE: "Real science has no agenda" posted by Todd Krieger on September 26, 2021 at 05:03:18:
"This isn't where the "science denial" accusations are taking place..... They're taking place in which "facts" haven't come close to being resolved...... Yet those claiming "science" are treating this as if the facts have been resolved...... Audio cables happens to be a part of this. (The treatment of COVID is maybe the most blatant example of this.)"
No, audio cables are not part of it. This is a prime example of what I am talking about. There is absolutely no aspect of cable performance that is not thoroughly understood and accounted for in well established laws of physics in electromagnetism, nor is there anything regarding cable performance that defies measurements. There is absolutely NOTHING unresolved about this. Further more there is nothing unresolved about the thresholds of human hearing where cable performance will make an audible effect.
On top of that what we know about psychoacoustics accurately predicts that under sighted conditions people will percieve differences in sound where there are no audible differences.
So not only do we know how cables perform and what is and is not audible we also knowthat people will percieve non existant differences because of how humans process what they hear. Science has this topic completely covered including audiophile belief in cable sound where there isno "cable sound."
The only place where this is allegedly unresolved is in the world of audiophilia. It is well resolved in the world of physics and psycoacoustics.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: "Real science has no agenda" - Analog Scott 09/26/2109:12:53 09/26/21 (24)
- RE: "Real science has no agenda" - Todd Krieger 09:47:34 09/26/21 (23)
- "People aren't denying science, they just don't agree with a particular finding" - Analog Scott 10:12:35 09/26/21 (0)
- RE: "Real science has no agenda" - Tre' 10:01:13 09/26/21 (20)
- RE: "Real science has no agenda" - Davey 10:25:36 09/26/21 (1)
- and keep in mind... - Analog Scott 10:39:51 09/26/21 (0)
- RE: "Real science has no agenda" - Analog Scott 10:16:11 09/26/21 (17)
- RE: "Real science has no agenda" - dogscanskate 11:13:03 09/26/21 (16)
- "So now you are making the point that there may be audible differences between cables?" - Analog Scott 11:29:41 09/26/21 (15)
- RE: "So now you are making the point that there may be audible differences between cables?" - dogscanskate 13:01:57 09/26/21 (6)
- more lessons - Analog Scott 14:02:50 09/26/21 (4)
- RE: more lessons - dogscanskate 14:46:08 09/26/21 (3)
- " I do object to people who come here and mock those who do not agree with them" - Analog Scott 14:56:48 09/26/21 (2)
- RE: " I do object to people who come here and mock those who do not agree with them" - dogscanskate 15:27:01 09/26/21 (1)
- more meat - Analog Scott 15:42:20 09/26/21 (0)
- RE: "So now you are making the point that there may be audible differences between cables?" - b.l.zeebub 13:17:54 09/26/21 (0)
- RE: "So now you are making the point that there may be audible differences between cables?" - rivervalley817 11:38:14 09/26/21 (7)
- well... - Analog Scott 11:48:06 09/26/21 (6)
- RE: well... - rivervalley817 11:57:45 09/26/21 (5)
- RE: well... - dogscanskate 13:08:01 09/26/21 (2)
- RE: well... - rivervalley817 13:46:56 09/26/21 (0)
- "where's the proof?" - Analog Scott 13:39:20 09/26/21 (0)
- I'm biased - Analog Scott 12:09:46 09/26/21 (1)
- RE: I'm biased - rivervalley817 12:37:40 09/26/21 (0)
- RE: "Real science has no agenda" - Analog Scott 09:56:40 09/26/21 (0)