In Reply to: I'm thinking posted by E-Stat on September 24, 2021 at 09:45:59:
.well at least not understanding. nothing like a graph of noise levels with no indication of *the actual levels* to prove...that you don't understand the subject of noise.
I do have to ask, what is actually being measured there? I'm going to make a pre-emptive prediction. It isn't the actual output of any internal power supply of any actual audio component.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- No you really are not thinking - Analog Scott 09/24/2111:11:34 09/24/21 (15)
- Thinking about noise - E-Stat 11:17:51 09/24/21 (14)
- even with an explination you failed - Analog Scott 12:50:05 09/24/21 (13)
- Watch the video for answers - E-Stat 12:52:23 09/24/21 (12)
- I watched the video. It does not answer any of my questions - Analog Scott 15:16:56 09/24/21 (11)
- Seems we have different objectives - E-Stat 15:24:16 09/24/21 (10)
- maybe. My objective is better subjective sound quality - Analog Scott 15:33:33 09/24/21 (9)
- Click your heels, Dorothy - E-Stat 15:45:08 09/24/21 (8)
- Now you are just being rude - Analog Scott 16:00:33 09/24/21 (7)
- Sorry to have asked you to perform two clicks - E-Stat 16:02:41 09/24/21 (2)
- why would you take two posts to ask me to do anything when all you have to do is just answer once? - Analog Scott 18:11:39 09/24/21 (1)
- Hmmm - E-Stat 18:30:05 09/24/21 (0)
- and just as a follow up. I take it you have no interest in putting your B.S. to an actual objective test - Analog Scott 16:02:23 09/24/21 (3)
- Parlor games no longer interest me - E-Stat 16:19:15 09/24/21 (2)
- If you think scientific protocols are parlor games that is your perogative - Analog Scott 18:15:16 09/24/21 (1)
- Never mind -nt - E-Stat 18:30:35 09/24/21 (0)