In Reply to: I'mmore than happy to test the veracity of my so called "speculation" posted by Analog Scott on September 24, 2021 at 09:24:48:
No one will step up and put the claim to the test.
a wide range of audio professionals and music lovers alike couldn't care less about impressing - YOU.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Because - E-Stat 09/24/2109:27:30 09/24/21 (20)
- Excuses is what I expect and what I am already seing here - Analog Scott 09:40:00 09/24/21 (19)
- "No one walks away from an easy 20K" - Dave_K 05:59:56 09/25/21 (1)
- I will put any amount up to 20K myself - Analog Scott 11:19:03 09/25/21 (0)
- I'm thinking - E-Stat 09:45:59 09/24/21 (16)
- No you really are not thinking - Analog Scott 11:11:34 09/24/21 (15)
- Thinking about noise - E-Stat 11:17:51 09/24/21 (14)
- even with an explination you failed - Analog Scott 12:50:05 09/24/21 (13)
- Watch the video for answers - E-Stat 12:52:23 09/24/21 (12)
- I watched the video. It does not answer any of my questions - Analog Scott 15:16:56 09/24/21 (11)
- Seems we have different objectives - E-Stat 15:24:16 09/24/21 (10)
- maybe. My objective is better subjective sound quality - Analog Scott 15:33:33 09/24/21 (9)
- Click your heels, Dorothy - E-Stat 15:45:08 09/24/21 (8)
- Now you are just being rude - Analog Scott 16:00:33 09/24/21 (7)
- Sorry to have asked you to perform two clicks - E-Stat 16:02:41 09/24/21 (2)
- why would you take two posts to ask me to do anything when all you have to do is just answer once? - Analog Scott 18:11:39 09/24/21 (1)
- Hmmm - E-Stat 18:30:05 09/24/21 (0)
- and just as a follow up. I take it you have no interest in putting your B.S. to an actual objective test - Analog Scott 16:02:23 09/24/21 (3)
- Parlor games no longer interest me - E-Stat 16:19:15 09/24/21 (2)
- If you think scientific protocols are parlor games that is your perogative - Analog Scott 18:15:16 09/24/21 (1)
- Never mind -nt - E-Stat 18:30:35 09/24/21 (0)