|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
|
|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
In Reply to: Good thing! posted by E-Stat on September 24, 2021 at 07:12:04:
at the ARC webpage. I didn't see any mention of after market power cords. But I did check the specs on their current lineup of components. None of which were sporting <-70 db of noise. Not even close.
Soooo their products are either competently designed and have no audible noise from their power supplies or......they are measuring their products using these after market power cords and not the stock power cords which would make their published specs dishonest. That would be quite scandelous
Maybe what is happening here is some confusion between ARC coddling their current customer base who largely believe in things like expensive power cords making an audible difference with components that are already sufficiently free of noise and actually claiming their products need an out sourced power cord to do the basic and simple job of adequate noise filtering in their internal power supplies.
Bottom line is in their own specs. Those specs were either acheivedwith the stock power cords and show more than enough noise reduction for any after market product to make an audible difference.Or they are publishing blatently dishonest specs.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- well, you made me look - Analog Scott 09/24/2109:09:58 09/24/21 (54)
- Or, choice "B" - E-Stat 09:12:45 09/24/21 (53)
- I'mmore than happy to test the veracity of my so called "speculation" - Analog Scott 09:24:48 09/24/21 (52)
- "Science Deniers"............ - Todd Krieger 03:38:18 09/26/21 (30)
- "Real science has no agenda" - Analog Scott 04:25:41 09/26/21 (29)
- RE: "Real science has no agenda" - Todd Krieger 05:03:18 09/26/21 (28)
- Part 2 of my response - Analog Scott 09:29:57 09/26/21 (2)
- RE: Part 2 of my response - Todd Krieger 05:56:28 09/27/21 (1)
- RE: Part 2 of my response - Analog Scott 06:50:20 09/27/21 (0)
- RE: "Real science has no agenda" - Analog Scott 09:12:53 09/26/21 (24)
- RE: "Real science has no agenda" - Todd Krieger 09:47:34 09/26/21 (23)
- "People aren't denying science, they just don't agree with a particular finding" - Analog Scott 10:12:35 09/26/21 (0)
- RE: "Real science has no agenda" - Tre' 10:01:13 09/26/21 (20)
- RE: "Real science has no agenda" - Davey 10:25:36 09/26/21 (1)
- and keep in mind... - Analog Scott 10:39:51 09/26/21 (0)
- RE: "Real science has no agenda" - Analog Scott 10:16:11 09/26/21 (17)
- RE: "Real science has no agenda" - dogscanskate 11:13:03 09/26/21 (16)
- "So now you are making the point that there may be audible differences between cables?" - Analog Scott 11:29:41 09/26/21 (15)
- RE: "So now you are making the point that there may be audible differences between cables?" - dogscanskate 13:01:57 09/26/21 (6)
- more lessons - Analog Scott 14:02:50 09/26/21 (4)
- RE: more lessons - dogscanskate 14:46:08 09/26/21 (3)
- " I do object to people who come here and mock those who do not agree with them" - Analog Scott 14:56:48 09/26/21 (2)
- RE: " I do object to people who come here and mock those who do not agree with them" - dogscanskate 15:27:01 09/26/21 (1)
- more meat - Analog Scott 15:42:20 09/26/21 (0)
- RE: "So now you are making the point that there may be audible differences between cables?" - b.l.zeebub 13:17:54 09/26/21 (0)
- RE: "So now you are making the point that there may be audible differences between cables?" - rivervalley817 11:38:14 09/26/21 (7)
- well... - Analog Scott 11:48:06 09/26/21 (6)
- RE: well... - rivervalley817 11:57:45 09/26/21 (5)
- RE: well... - dogscanskate 13:08:01 09/26/21 (2)
- RE: well... - rivervalley817 13:46:56 09/26/21 (0)
- "where's the proof?" - Analog Scott 13:39:20 09/26/21 (0)
- I'm biased - Analog Scott 12:09:46 09/26/21 (1)
- RE: I'm biased - rivervalley817 12:37:40 09/26/21 (0)
- RE: "Real science has no agenda" - Analog Scott 09:56:40 09/26/21 (0)
- Because - E-Stat 09:27:30 09/24/21 (20)
- Excuses is what I expect and what I am already seing here - Analog Scott 09:40:00 09/24/21 (19)
- "No one walks away from an easy 20K" - Dave_K 05:59:56 09/25/21 (1)
- I will put any amount up to 20K myself - Analog Scott 11:19:03 09/25/21 (0)
- I'm thinking - E-Stat 09:45:59 09/24/21 (16)
- No you really are not thinking - Analog Scott 11:11:34 09/24/21 (15)
- Thinking about noise - E-Stat 11:17:51 09/24/21 (14)
- even with an explination you failed - Analog Scott 12:50:05 09/24/21 (13)
- Watch the video for answers - E-Stat 12:52:23 09/24/21 (12)
- I watched the video. It does not answer any of my questions - Analog Scott 15:16:56 09/24/21 (11)
- Seems we have different objectives - E-Stat 15:24:16 09/24/21 (10)
- maybe. My objective is better subjective sound quality - Analog Scott 15:33:33 09/24/21 (9)
- Click your heels, Dorothy - E-Stat 15:45:08 09/24/21 (8)
- Now you are just being rude - Analog Scott 16:00:33 09/24/21 (7)
- Sorry to have asked you to perform two clicks - E-Stat 16:02:41 09/24/21 (2)
- why would you take two posts to ask me to do anything when all you have to do is just answer once? - Analog Scott 18:11:39 09/24/21 (1)
- Hmmm - E-Stat 18:30:05 09/24/21 (0)
- and just as a follow up. I take it you have no interest in putting your B.S. to an actual objective test - Analog Scott 16:02:23 09/24/21 (3)
- Parlor games no longer interest me - E-Stat 16:19:15 09/24/21 (2)
- If you think scientific protocols are parlor games that is your perogative - Analog Scott 18:15:16 09/24/21 (1)
- Never mind -nt - E-Stat 18:30:35 09/24/21 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
