In Reply to: Need a suggestion for manufacturers of an ultrasonic frequency sound device posted by MikeGalla on October 10, 2017 at 19:50:07:
Going past 20kHz is possible, but more difficult. Currently the easiest thing to do is to purchase a 1" beryllium dome tweeter from Scan-Speak. This will give flat frequency response to about 30kHz and then start to rise as the diaphragm "breaks up" at its first "oil can" resonant mode, with a 10dB - 15dB peak at around 40kHz. Diamond is stiffer, but also heavier and won't go much higher. The max SPL at 1 meter will be around 96dB or so. More than that and you will likely blow the voice coil.
If you need higher SPLs, then try to purchase the 1" Be dome horn tweeter used in the JBL K2-S9800. It's discontinued now, but the horn loading will give another 10 dB output over roughly the same frequency range.
To go beyond that, you will either have to have something custom-made or else use what they use for ultrasonic transducers - piezoelectric crystals. These operate in a resonant mode and are only good for creating one single frequency. This is OK for a signaling system but horrible for music.
There were also some Be ribbons made by Pioneer/TAD that would go to 40kHz, but they were super expensive ($1000 each) and discontinued 5 years ago. They had a built-in horn, but the rectangular shape of the diaphragm made the off-axis dispersion different in the two axes.
Hope this helps.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Ultrasonics? - Charles Hansen 10/11/1701:12:00 10/11/17 (14)
- RE: Annoying Ultrasonics - AbeCollins 13:35:29 10/12/17 (5)
- RE: Annoying Ultrasonics - Todd Krieger 22:47:25 10/12/17 (0)
- Signal generator and 075 JBLs - FenderLover 18:33:28 10/12/17 (1)
- RE: Signal generator and 075 JBLs - Inmate51 19:50:25 10/12/17 (0)
- RE: Annoying Ultrasonics - Charles Hansen 18:18:10 10/12/17 (0)
- RE: Annoying Ultrasonics - Awe-d-o-file 16:44:52 10/12/17 (0)
- RE: Ultrasonics? - Kingshead 03:01:45 10/11/17 (7)
- RE: Ultrasonics? - Charles Hansen 11:39:05 10/11/17 (6)
- RE: Ultrasonics? - Kingshead 12:13:12 10/11/17 (5)
- RE: Ultrasonics? - Charles Hansen 15:48:54 10/11/17 (4)
- RE: Ultrasonics? - Kingshead 16:35:28 10/11/17 (3)
- RE: Ultrasonics? - Charles Hansen 21:41:55 10/11/17 (2)
- RE: Ultrasonics? - Kingshead 02:43:19 10/12/17 (1)
- RE: Ultrasonics? - Charles Hansen 07:24:15 10/16/17 (0)