A friend came over for a listening session couple of days ago, and after listening to some of my recent vinyl acquisitions, he started wondering if digital might sound as nice as LPs. So we said why don't we do a quick side-by-side comparison, for a lark?
So I played Sgt. Pepper's opening track (streaming AIFF stereo file from Mac Mini via ethernet cable into modded Logitech Squeezebox Touch digital transport and then into Beresford Bushmaster DAC connected via digital coax cable). Sounded great, with awesome deep bass and everything super clean and legible. No distortions, just perfectly clean (almost clinically clean) sound.
Immediately after the song finished, I switched over to playing the same track on my turntable (Systemdek IIX with Denon DL-103 cartridge mounted on Rega RB300 tonearm, into hand-made SUT into Emotiva XPS-1 MM phono stage). I was spinning the original Sgt. Pepper's stereo pressing. The difference? Staggering!
The music simply came to life on the turntable. The guitars leapt out from the speakers, the bass felt like molten lava, Paul's voice was really shouting with excitement. Gone were the clinically clean glossy sounds, to be replaced with impolite, nasty, raunchy gutbucket rock and/or roll sounds.
But most importantly, the music coming out from the turntable was SWINGING! So much so that we couldn't help ourselves and remained glued to our seat for the remainder of the side one. It was captivating, mesmerizing, magical. Once side one was over, we both had to exclaim how, indeed, Sgt. Pepper's IS the best album ever made!
And then the weird thing happened. My friend said that, if the stereo LP sounds so amazing, imagine how incredible would the mono, the Holy Grail Pepper sound?!? Do I have a mono copy? Well, sure I do, I have the squeaky clean 2012 all analog 180 gram vinyl release of the mono Pepper. The release that everyone is hailing as being the absolute best sounding ever.
So we put the mono LP on, expecting to hear nothing short of a miracle. Alas, nothing like that happened. Compared to the stereo LP, the mono LP sounded dull, muffled, crowded, congested. The swinging was gone, the palpable life-like presence wasn't there anymore.
That made me wonder -- could it be that the magic was missing from the mono LP due to the fact that I was playing it using the stereo cartridge? Many people claim that the only way to really hear mono LPs is to use the mono cartridge.
Opinions?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Listening to digital/vinyl and then mono - magiccarpetride 11:29:24 09/11/17 (44)
- "Molten lava..." - tketcham 16:06:06 09/15/17 (2)
- RE: "Molten lava..." - magiccarpetride 11:46:53 09/19/17 (1)
- RE: "Molten lava..." - tketcham 06:47:30 09/20/17 (0)
- RE: Listening to digital/vinyl and then mono - SgreenP@MSN.com 14:18:20 09/13/17 (0)
- RE: Listening to mono - hifitommy 14:48:13 09/12/17 (0)
- RThat particular mono LP may have been worn.. All it would take. NT - 3+4=5 06:56:26 09/12/17 (3)
- RE: RThat particular mono LP may have been worn.. All it would take. NT - magiccarpetride 09:56:19 09/12/17 (2)
- How do you know it was not a 'return'.. rewrapped and sold as new? nt - 3+4=5 10:21:56 09/12/17 (1)
- RE: How do you know it was not a 'return'.. rewrapped and sold as new? nt - magiccarpetride 10:29:19 09/12/17 (0)
- If Your System Has a Mono Switch...... - Todd Krieger 20:38:52 09/11/17 (16)
- RE: If Your System Has a Mono Switch...... - PAR 03:10:09 09/12/17 (15)
- "stereo never caught on as a mass market medium here until the late sixties. . . " - Chris from Lafayette 11:39:14 09/12/17 (9)
- RE: "stereo was a DOLLAR more than mono - hifitommy 14:39:59 09/12/17 (1)
- Yes - that was a big factor - Chris from Lafayette 11:10:55 09/13/17 (0)
- RE: "stereo never caught on as a mass market medium here until the late sixties. . . " - PAR 13:14:19 09/12/17 (6)
- Precisely so! - Charles Hansen 09:37:51 09/13/17 (5)
- RE: Precisely so! - Andy43 10:21:28 09/14/17 (0)
- Very interesting - that info was indeed unknown to me - Chris from Lafayette 11:01:57 09/13/17 (0)
- RE: Precisely so! - PAR 10:56:48 09/13/17 (2)
- RE: Precisely so! - Charles Hansen 13:16:25 09/13/17 (1)
- That Lucas reputation - M3 lover 11:20:11 09/19/17 (0)
- RE: If Your System Has a Mono Switch...... - magiccarpetride 09:51:14 09/12/17 (4)
- RE: If Your System Has a Mono Switch...... - PAR 11:26:44 09/12/17 (3)
- RE: If Your System Has a Mono Switch...... - Todd Krieger 18:19:21 09/14/17 (2)
- RE: If Your System Has a Mono Switch...... - PAR 01:11:01 09/15/17 (1)
- RE: If Your System Has a Mono Switch...... - fantja 06:40:45 09/15/17 (0)
- RE: Listening to digital/vinyl and then mono - kentaja 13:11:51 09/11/17 (9)
- RE: posted long, long ago - Story 17:27:43 09/11/17 (4)
- RE: posted long, long ago - coffee-phil 21:34:42 09/11/17 (1)
- RE: great idea - Story 06:06:22 09/12/17 (0)
- RE: posted long, long ago - kentaja 19:31:12 09/11/17 (1)
- RE: yes PITA - Story 06:02:56 09/12/17 (0)
- RE: Listening to digital/vinyl and then mono - coffee-phil 13:35:28 09/11/17 (3)
- RE: Listening to digital/vinyl and then mono - kentaja 14:02:58 09/11/17 (2)
- RE: Listening to digital/vinyl and then mono - coffee-phil 14:40:57 09/11/17 (1)
- RE: Listening to digital/vinyl and then mono - kentaja 14:50:56 09/11/17 (0)
- I would suggest that you widen your sample to include more than one recording. nt - viridian 12:30:27 09/11/17 (0)
- RE: Listening to digital/vinyl and then mono - Jack G 12:29:42 09/11/17 (2)
- RE: Listening to digital/vinyl and then mono - magiccarpetride 09:59:04 09/12/17 (0)
- RE: Listening to digital/vinyl and then mono - PAR 13:33:01 09/11/17 (0)
- RE: Listening to digital/vinyl and then mono - PAR 12:18:33 09/11/17 (0)
- RE: Listening to digital/vinyl and then mono - coffee-phil 12:16:08 09/11/17 (2)
- RE: Listening to digital/vinyl and then mono - kentaja 13:10:17 09/11/17 (1)
- RE: Listening to digital/vinyl and then mono - dcharvonia 15:43:12 09/11/17 (0)