|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
|
|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
In Reply to: Re: When does a better mouse trap turn distasteful carboncopy cloning? posted by tcain on July 8, 2003 at 14:00:23:
The major issue in the both amps' controversy, is the actual use of the four parts creating a chassis. You've probably also noticed that a PS case used by 47Labs is close resemblance of M-F X series cases, yet nobody seemed to complain.Your arguments are very logical and make sense. But it appears, that this method of building a small chasis is the best for that type of design. Should it be kept then, as 47Labs exclusive, without others being able to use it (even in different form, size and pattern)?
The market place has tons of products looking like the original with some differences: from cars to jeans to shoes to soft drinks. Ever wonder why all soda cans have same shape and volume? It is the free market entreprise and anything that is not copy protected/patented can be emulated.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: When does a better mouse trap turn distasteful carboncopy cloning? - Peter Daniel 07/8/0316:00:24 07/8/03 (4)
- Re: When does a better mouse trap turn distasteful carboncopy cloning? - tcain 18:15:59 07/8/03 (3)
- Re: When does a better mouse trap turn distasteful carboncopy cloning? - Peter Daniel 18:51:30 07/8/03 (2)
- Re: When does a better mouse trap turn distasteful carboncopy cloning? - tcain 19:03:35 07/8/03 (1)
- Re: When does a better mouse trap turn distasteful carboncopy cloning? - Peter DAniel 19:23:40 07/8/03 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
