In Reply to: Re: When does a better mouse trap turn distasteful carboncopy cloning? posted by Peter Daniel on July 8, 2003 at 12:44:27:
Of course I can comment on it. I *owned* a gaincard, knew it well. How is this different than Sirjan's review? he didn't have a Shigaraki there to compare with, and he didn't mention even reviewing the Gaincard. Seems valid enough to me, if you consider his review valid.For something "different" than the Gaincard, it sure looks like it's trying really hard to be LIKE the gaincard... yes, the knobs/feet/looks to me just don't have nearly the aesthetic appeal as the gaincard case. But that's just me.
I guess another question is: would this AMP-1 exist or even stand a chance of being noticed if it had not been for the Gaincard initially? Probably not. Anyway, imitation is a sincere form of flattery I guess.
-Ed
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: When does a better mouse trap turn distasteful carboncopy cloning? - Ed Sawyer 07/8/0313:03:52 07/8/03 (8)
- Final amp, or Camelot phono stage - FR Drew 19:05:40 07/8/03 (0)
- Re: When does a better mouse trap turn distasteful carboncopy cloning? - Peter Daniel 13:38:50 07/8/03 (6)
- Re: When does a better mouse trap turn distasteful carboncopy cloning? - tcain 14:00:23 07/8/03 (5)
- Re: When does a better mouse trap turn distasteful carboncopy cloning? - Peter Daniel 16:00:24 07/8/03 (4)
- Re: When does a better mouse trap turn distasteful carboncopy cloning? - tcain 18:15:59 07/8/03 (3)
- Re: When does a better mouse trap turn distasteful carboncopy cloning? - Peter Daniel 18:51:30 07/8/03 (2)
- Re: When does a better mouse trap turn distasteful carboncopy cloning? - tcain 19:03:35 07/8/03 (1)
- Re: When does a better mouse trap turn distasteful carboncopy cloning? - Peter DAniel 19:23:40 07/8/03 (0)