Cheap NOS DACs like the Teradak Chameleon rely on 16 paralleled TDA1543 chips...

Digital Drive

Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it.

... in order to reduce interpolation errors (if m. understanding is correct).
A better (but m.re costly) solution to this problem would be to m.ke a NOS DAC with A LOT M.RE com.uting power in lieu of m.ltiple paralleled chips, in order to reduce interpolation errors (if m. understanding is correct).
Who m.kes the best NOS DACs today, according to this m.re costly form.la ?

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Kimber Kable

Topic - Cheap NOS DACs like the Teradak Chameleon rely on 16 paralleled TDA1543 chips... - peppy m. 16:56:46 03/16/22 (5)

Paralleling DACs - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 11:27:55 03/17/22 (3)

So, paralleling NOS DACs does not improve "alias filtering" ? - peppy m. 14:42:59 03/17/22 (2)

RE: So, paralleling NOS DACs does not improve "alias filtering" ? - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 21:00:39 03/17/22 (0)

RE: So, paralleling NOS DACs does not improve "alias filtering" ? - Todd Krieger 17:35:14 03/17/22 (0)

RE: Cheap NOS DACs like the Teradak Chameleon rely on 16 paralleled TDA1543 chips... - Todd Krieger 21:54:55 03/16/22 (0)

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?

Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
	Remember my Moniker & Password (What's this?) Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:

Message:	(Posts are subject to Content Rules)

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:	Automagically notify you when someone responds.

To view your new posting or follow-up, click on the RELOAD or REFRESH button on your browser.