It was never claimed that CD was "Hi-Rez", they only claimed it was "Perfect Sound Forever".

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Why the CD is the original Hi-Rez. and why you don't need anything higher - Time_Stands_Still 10:32:52 02/15/22 (273)

That's pretty much the same argument naysayers used for Blu Ray vs DVD. - geoffkait 16:33:56 03/3/22 (0)

RE: Why the CD is the original Hi-Rez. and why you don't need anything higher - roberttcan 18:35:43 02/28/22 (26)

RE: Why the CD is the original Hi-Rez. and why you don't need anything higher - Time_Stands_Still 15:14:17 03/1/22 (16)

RE: Why the CD is the original Hi-Rez. and why you don't need anything higher - roberttcan 09:37:50 03/2/22 (2)

RE: Why the CD is the original Hi-Rez. and why you don't need anything higher - Time_Stands_Still 01:37:16 03/7/22 (1)

QAnon lives! Logical fallacies galore! - geoffkait 01:57:09 03/7/22 (0)

RE: Why the CD is the original Hi-Rez. and why you don't need anything higher - geoffkait 15:52:14 03/1/22 (12)

RE: Why the CD is the original Hi-Rez. and why you don't need anything higher - Time_Stands_Still 18:08:03 03/1/22 (11)

RE: Why the CD is the original Hi-Rez. and why you don't need anything higher - geoffkait 04:09:22 03/2/22 (10)

RE: Why the CD is the original Hi-Rez. and why you don't need anything higher - roberttcan 09:40:03 03/2/22 (9)

RE: Why the CD is the original Hi-Rez. and why you don't need anything higher - Time_Stands_Still 01:48:04 03/7/22 (5)

Logical fallacy #27 - geoffkait 02:04:33 03/7/22 (4)

RE: Logical fallacy #27 - Time_Stands_Still 02:10:55 03/7/22 (3)

RE: Logical fallacy #28, #29 - geoffkait 03:40:16 03/8/22 (2)

RE: Logical fallacy #28, #29 - Time_Stands_Still 11:47:55 03/8/22 (1)

RE: Logical fallacy #28, #29 - geoffkait 13:52:47 03/8/22 (0)

RE: Why the CD is the original Hi-Rez. and why you don't need anything higher - geoffkait 12:56:01 03/2/22 (2)

RE: Why the CD is the original Hi-Rez. and why you don't need anything higher - roberttcan 17:12:43 03/2/22 (1)

RE: Why the CD is the original Hi-Rez. and why you don't need anything higher - geoffkait 00:28:21 03/3/22 (0)

RE: Why the CD is the original Hi-Rez. and why you don't need anything higher - geoffkait 20:29:23 02/28/22 (8)

RE: Why the CD is the original Hi-Rez. and why you don't need anything higher - roberttcan 07:53:04 03/1/22 (7)

RE: Why the CD is the original Hi-Rez. and why you don't need anything higher - geoffkait 08:01:24 03/1/22 (6)

RE: Why the CD is the original Hi-Rez. and why you don't need anything higher - roberttcan 09:41:27 03/2/22 (5)

Blind results really don't matter! - jedrider 20:03:59 03/8/22 (1)

RE: Blind results really don't matter! - geoffkait 05:12:04 03/9/22 (0)

RE: Why the CD is the original Hi-Rez. and why you don't need anything higher - geoffkait 00:32:40 03/3/22 (2)

RE: Why the CD is the original Hi-Rez. and why you don't need anything higher - roberttcan 07:50:53 03/4/22 (1)

RE: Why the CD is the original Hi-Rez. and why you don't need anything higher - geoffkait 14:54:09 03/4/22 (0)

BUT: You you DO need a DAC setup that can extract the data to it's fullest - Freo-1 13:43:34 02/20/22 (19)

The DAC processes whatever the transport sends it - geoffkait 06:27:10 02/21/22 (18)

THE CD has ERROR CORRECTION - jedrider 11:26:44 03/2/22 (12)

RE: THE CD has ERROR CORRECTION - Time_Stands_Still 01:54:28 03/7/22 (5)

Yeah, that's what they told you and you lapped it up. - geoffkait 02:55:47 03/8/22 (4)

RE: Yeah, that's what they told you and you lapped it up. - Time_Stands_Still 11:41:29 03/8/22 (3)

The fidelity of CD is accurate to any humans hearing. - jedrider 14:00:21 03/8/22 (1)

Bingo! Nt - geoffkait 06:43:30 03/12/22 (0)

RE: Yeah, that's what they told you and you lapped it up. - geoffkait 13:56:01 03/8/22 (0)

The short answer is yes and no. Not all errors that occur during laser-read process are correctable. - geoffkait 14:36:35 03/3/22 (5)

RE: The short answer is yes and no. Not all errors that occur during laser-read process are correctable. - Time_Stands_Still 02:00:42 03/7/22 (4)

RE: The short answer is yes and no. Not all errors that occur during laser-read process are correctable. - geoffkait 03:24:10 03/7/22 (3)

RE: The short answer is yes and no. Not all errors that occur during laser-read process are correctable. - Time_Stands_Still 00:43:56 03/8/22 (2)

Different Filters - jedrider 09:39:29 03/9/22 (0)

Logical fallacy #44, Excedrine headache # 6 - geoffkait 04:15:41 03/8/22 (0)

Who says it's only a transport? - Freo-1 12:53:39 02/21/22 (4)

Look at title of thread OP. Nt - geoffkait 14:14:08 02/21/22 (3)

The title refers to the FORMAT, not just the disc - Freo-1 14:33:28 02/21/22 (2)

RE: The title refers to the FORMAT, not just the disc - geoffkait 14:51:51 02/21/22 (1)

Good question on Hi Res files - Freo-1 17:09:57 02/21/22 (0)

You cannot prove a negative. - geoffkait 03:07:10 02/18/22 (0)

RE:what about XRCD and SACD? - chuck55 21:22:27 02/16/22 (6)

Cassettes had XDR - geoffkait 03:58:08 02/27/22 (3)

RE: Cassettes had XDR - Time_Stands_Still 02:17:18 03/7/22 (2)

Digitally remastered cassettes - geoffkait 08:54:01 03/9/22 (1)

Digitally remastered cassettes are generally much more musical and dynamic - chuck55 21:10:29 03/11/22 (0)

But don't "blueprinted engines" run smoother, at the very least ? (nt - peppy m. 08:36:08 02/18/22 (1)

agreed (nt) - chuck55 21:51:36 02/26/22 (0)

Question: Have you ever compared many 16:44 titles to Hi-Rez ones, to note any possible sonic diffs ? - peppy m. 14:52:11 02/16/22 (3)

Repeatability and transferability - geoffkait 09:05:29 03/9/22 (0)

RE: Question: Have you ever compared many 16:44 titles to Hi-Rez ones, to note any possible sonic diffs ? - Time_Stands_Still 15:19:26 02/16/22 (1)

RE: Question: Have you ever compared many 16:44 titles to Hi-Rez ones, to note any possible sonic diffs ? - Tre' 17:28:20 02/21/22 (0)

A Higher Sampling Rate Has Nothing To Do Hearing Frequencies - Jonesy 14:38:01 02/16/22 (15)

it's quite a mess - cymbals and such are NOT 20khz - Story 02:50:15 02/17/22 (3)

Yoko Ono's voice is up around 15k Hz. Nt - geoffkait 08:57:32 02/17/22 (0)

RE: it's quite a mess - cymbals and such are NOT 20khz - Jonesy 08:52:59 02/17/22 (1)

competing against 10 in the brass section - Story 03:14:34 02/18/22 (0)

RE: A Higher Sampling Rate Has Nothing To Do Hearing Frequencies - Time_Stands_Still 15:16:28 02/16/22 (10)

RE: A Higher Sampling Rate Has Nothing To Do Hearing Frequencies - Jonesy 15:50:22 02/16/22 (9)

RE: A Higher Sampling Rate Has Nothing To Do Hearing Frequencies - Time_Stands_Still 15:59:34 02/16/22 (8)

RE: A Higher Sampling Rate Has Nothing To Do Hearing Frequencies - Jonesy 18:37:08 02/16/22 (7)

RE: A Higher Sampling Rate Has Nothing To Do Hearing Frequencies - Time_Stands_Still 01:22:58 02/17/22 (6)

RE: A Higher Sampling Rate Has Nothing To Do Hearing Frequencies - Jonesy 08:46:32 02/17/22 (5)

Roll the clock back ten years - E-Stat 10:14:37 02/17/22 (4)

RE: Roll the clock back ten years - Jonesy 15:23:00 02/17/22 (3)

You're welcome - E-Stat 15:39:24 02/17/22 (2)

Enjoyed the Videos! - Jonesy 18:27:20 02/19/22 (1)

RE: Enjoyed the Videos! - E-Stat 08:21:44 02/20/22 (0)

RE: Why the CD is the original Hi-Rez. and why you don't need anything higher - tube524 11:10:17 02/16/22 (15)

Which would you choose? - E-Stat 11:56:35 02/16/22 (14)

RE: Which would you choose? - roberttcan 19:45:34 02/28/22 (0)

RE: Which would you choose? - Time_Stands_Still 15:25:13 02/16/22 (12)

Don't know about you, but... - E-Stat 15:33:17 02/16/22 (11)

RE: Don't know about you, but... - Time_Stands_Still 15:46:52 02/16/22 (10)

RE: Don't know about you, but... - E-Stat 15:53:08 02/16/22 (9)

RE: Don't know about you, but... - Time_Stands_Still 16:05:59 02/16/22 (8)

Still haven't answered my question - E-Stat 16:11:19 02/16/22 (7)

RE: Still haven't answered my question - Time_Stands_Still 16:19:26 02/16/22 (6)

RE: Still haven't answered my question - roberttcan 17:15:20 03/2/22 (3)

RE: Still haven't answered my question - Time_Stands_Still 11:47:46 03/3/22 (2)

RE: Still haven't answered my question - roberttcan 07:53:14 03/4/22 (1)

RE: Still haven't answered my question - Time_Stands_Still 18:58:19 03/4/22 (0)

QAnon-speak. Nt - geoffkait 08:59:26 02/17/22 (0)

Ah, you can read after all! - E-Stat 17:11:31 02/16/22 (0)

Your explanation completely misses the point - E-Stat 08:14:24 02/16/22 (147)

Slightly over two points cannot possibly define a sine wave - rickmcinnis@dogwoodfabrics.com 12:03:20 02/16/22 (20)

actually it's a mathematical fact that it can - Analog Scott 17:43:50 02/16/22 (16)

RE: actually it's a mathematical fact that it can - AbeCollins 08:30:14 02/17/22 (15)

RE: actually it's a mathematical fact that it can - geoffkait 08:55:10 02/17/22 (12)

RE: actually it's a mathematical fact that it can - Analog Scott 11:38:47 02/17/22 (11)

RE: actually it's a mathematical fact that it can - geoffkait 11:52:24 02/17/22 (10)

RE: actually it's a mathematical fact that it can - Analog Scott 12:41:52 02/17/22 (9)

RE: actually it's a mathematical fact that it can - geoffkait 12:55:21 02/17/22 (8)

RE: actually it's a mathematical fact that it can - Analog Scott 13:32:44 02/17/22 (7)

RE: actually it's a mathematical fact that it can - geoffkait 04:58:57 02/18/22 (6)

Your confession does not absolve you - Analog Scott 06:38:26 02/18/22 (5)

Apparently you're suffering from ingrown hair. Nt - geoffkait 06:49:59 02/18/22 (4)

I suppose you could be likened to an in grown hair - Analog Scott 07:17:00 02/18/22 (3)

RE: I suppose you could be likened to an in grown hair - roberttcan 17:16:51 03/2/22 (1)

RE: I suppose you could be likened to an in grown hair - geoffkait 22:35:47 03/2/22 (0)

RE: I suppose you could be likened to an in grown hair - geoffkait 09:21:18 02/18/22 (0)

RE: actually it's a mathematical fact that it can - Analog Scott 08:45:23 02/17/22 (1)

And in fact, anything in excess of two points is REDUNDANT [nt] - Chris from Lafayette 11:58:50 02/17/22 (0)

RE: Slightly over two points cannot possibly define a sine wave - Time_Stands_Still 15:28:14 02/16/22 (0)

RE: Slightly over two points cannot possibly define a sine wave - geoffkait 14:10:43 02/16/22 (0)

Slightly over two points cannot possibly define a sine wave - E-Stat 12:07:02 02/16/22 (0)

RE: Your explanation completely misses the point - Time_Stands_Still 09:35:32 02/16/22 (125)

You may proselytize all you wish! - E-Stat 10:06:07 02/16/22 (124)

It's not speculation, it's well documented human biology - Analog Scott 17:49:19 02/16/22 (112)

Interesting - E-Stat 17:54:55 02/16/22 (111)

RE: Interesting - Time_Stands_Still 01:39:13 02/17/22 (109)

RE: Interesting - E-Stat 06:08:31 02/17/22 (107)

RE: Interesting - Analog Scott 10:40:45 02/17/22 (106)

Understanding history - E-Stat 11:23:23 02/17/22 (105)

RE: Understanding history - Analog Scott 11:46:08 02/17/22 (104)

Nothing is *impossible* - E-Stat 12:15:44 02/17/22 (103)

Plenty of things are impossible - Analog Scott 12:50:45 02/17/22 (102)

Believe whatever you will - E-Stat 13:03:30 02/17/22 (101)

I believe the facts as stated by Sony and Philips, ya know the inventors of the CD - Analog Scott 13:36:12 02/17/22 (100)

Who developed the SACD format? - E-Stat 13:39:43 02/17/22 (99)

What does that have to do with the price of tea in China? - Analog Scott 14:50:44 02/17/22 (98)

I'll be happy to explain - E-Stat 14:58:24 02/17/22 (97)

That's your explination? - Analog Scott 15:04:32 02/17/22 (96)

Act chew ally - geoffkait 15:15:11 02/23/22 (51)

RE: Act chew ally - Analog Scott 03:59:19 02/25/22 (42)

You haven't been listening - geoffkait 04:33:18 02/25/22 (41)

RE: You haven't been listening - Analog Scott 05:24:19 02/25/22 (40)

Bad hair day for The Toxic Avenger? - geoffkait 06:22:33 02/25/22 (37)

I used to think you were playing dumb - Analog Scott 07:28:42 02/25/22 (36)

Stop using my lines! Get a hairlip! - geoffkait 09:15:24 02/25/22 (35)

RE: Stop using my lines! Get a hairlip! - Analog Scott 10:05:10 02/25/22 (34)

RE: Stop using my lines! Get a hairlip! - geoffkait 12:27:01 02/25/22 (33)

RE: Stop using my lines! Get a hairlip! - Analog Scott 12:42:53 02/25/22 (32)

"At that level of resolution" - geoffkait 15:48:47 02/25/22 (26)

RE: "At that level of resolution" - Time_Stands_Still 01:13:06 03/8/22 (5)

RE: "At that level of resolution" - geoffkait 04:28:29 03/8/22 (4)

RE: "At that level of resolution" - Time_Stands_Still 11:52:14 03/8/22 (3)

RE: "At that level of resolution" - geoffkait 14:00:14 03/8/22 (2)

RE: "At that level of resolution" - Time_Stands_Still 14:21:43 03/8/22 (1)

"I'm just being factual" - geoffkait 05:49:12 03/9/22 (0)

RE: "At that level of resolution" - Analog Scott 22:05:04 02/25/22 (19)

RE: "At that level of resolution" - geoffkait 04:17:28 02/26/22 (18)

Thank you once again for proving my point - Analog Scott 06:33:39 02/26/22 (17)

RE: Thank you once again for proving my point - roberttcan 17:17:28 03/2/22 (5)

RE: Thank you once again for proving my point - geoffkait 22:14:45 03/2/22 (4)

RE: Thank you once again for proving my point - roberttcan 07:55:41 03/4/22 (3)

RE: Thank you once again for proving my point - geoffkait 10:01:14 03/4/22 (2)

RE: Thank you once again for proving my point - roberttcan 11:14:57 03/4/22 (1)

RE: Thank you once again for proving my point - geoffkait 15:10:48 03/4/22 (0)

What, the point on the top of your head? - geoffkait 09:54:35 02/26/22 (10)

RE: What, the point on the top of your head? - Time_Stands_Still 01:24:22 03/8/22 (9)

RE: What, the point on the top of your head? - geoffkait 04:44:52 03/8/22 (8)

RE: What, the point on the top of your head? - Time_Stands_Still 12:04:10 03/8/22 (7)

RE: What, the point on the top of your head? - geoffkait 14:07:56 03/8/22 (2)

RE: What, the point on the top of your head? - Time_Stands_Still 14:26:57 03/8/22 (1)

RE: What, the point on the top of your head? - geoffkait 11:40:14 03/9/22 (0)

RE: What, the point on the top of your head? - Time_Stands_Still 12:07:21 03/8/22 (3)

RE: What, the point on the top of your head? - geoffkait 14:12:17 03/8/22 (2)

RE: What, the point on the top of your head? - Time_Stands_Still 14:30:17 03/8/22 (1)

RE: What, the point on the top of your head? - geoffkait 11:36:25 03/9/22 (0)

RE: Stop using my lines! Get a hairlip! - geoffkait 13:44:37 02/25/22 (4)

RE: Stop using my lines! Get a hairlip! - Analog Scott 22:09:39 02/25/22 (3)

RE: Stop using my lines! Get a hairlip! - geoffkait 04:21:26 02/26/22 (2)

RE: Stop using my lines! Get a hairlip! - Analog Scott 06:36:06 02/26/22 (1)

RE: Stop using my lines! Get a hairlip! - geoffkait 10:00:29 02/26/22 (0)

RE: You haven't been listening - Story 06:18:07 02/25/22 (1)

And his sidekick, monkey boy nt - geoffkait 06:23:48 02/25/22 (0)

RE: Act chew ally - Time_Stands_Still 17:21:00 02/24/22 (7)

Huh? - geoffkait 19:22:03 02/24/22 (6)

RE: Huh? - Time_Stands_Still 06:48:58 02/25/22 (5)

You keep saying that - geoffkait 09:21:42 02/25/22 (4)

RE: You keep saying that - Time_Stands_Still 09:56:49 02/25/22 (3)

RE: You keep saying that - geoffkait 11:51:53 02/25/22 (2)

RE: You keep saying that - Time_Stands_Still 18:12:53 02/25/22 (1)

RE: You keep saying that - geoffkait 04:27:09 02/26/22 (0)

Actually - E-Stat 15:15:30 02/17/22 (43)

RE: Actually - Time_Stands_Still 12:51:55 02/23/22 (37)

SACD vs CD - geoffkait 15:07:59 02/23/22 (2)

RE: SACD vs CD - Time_Stands_Still 17:12:16 02/24/22 (1)

RE: SACD vs CD - geoffkait 19:19:43 02/24/22 (0)

Easy answer - E-Stat 13:24:55 02/23/22 (33)

You don't speak for the entire industry - Analog Scott 04:02:41 02/25/22 (27)

Honestly - E-Stat 08:24:53 02/25/22 (26)

"Honestly?" Seriously? - Analog Scott 08:41:54 02/25/22 (25)

You sir are seriously deluded - E-Stat 09:01:43 02/25/22 (24)

RE: You sir are seriously deluded - Time_Stands_Still 10:00:47 02/25/22 (22)

Actually - E-Stat 10:25:56 02/25/22 (21)

Hilarious - Analog Scott 22:12:25 02/25/22 (1)

Logical fallacy alert! Nt - geoffkait 03:05:45 02/26/22 (0)

RE: Actually - Time_Stands_Still 18:27:00 02/25/22 (18)

Sorry - E-Stat 18:39:30 02/25/22 (17)

RE: Sorry - Time_Stands_Still 18:57:59 02/25/22 (16)

Once again - E-Stat 22:20:58 02/25/22 (15)

RE: Once again - Time_Stands_Still 11:27:00 02/26/22 (12)

I'm done - E-Stat 13:21:26 02/26/22 (10)

You'll be back - Analog Scott 16:49:44 02/26/22 (9)

Surprisingly as it may seem... - E-Stat 17:17:15 02/26/22 (8)

RE: Surprisingly as it may seem... - roberttcan 18:39:53 02/28/22 (1)

They are the same - E-Stat 19:33:09 02/28/22 (0)

Real world choices - Analog Scott 05:11:55 02/27/22 (5)

Did i just see another logical fallacy?! - geoffkait 14:15:44 03/5/22 (4)

RE: Did i just see another logical fallacy?! - Time_Stands_Still 00:49:27 03/8/22 (3)

Double talk - geoffkait 04:42:04 03/8/22 (2)

RE: Double talk - Time_Stands_Still 12:09:35 03/8/22 (1)

RE: Double talk - geoffkait 11:55:40 03/9/22 (0)

An award for the most logical fallacies in a single post goes to...-. - geoffkait 12:46:15 02/26/22 (0)

RE: Once again - Analog Scott 11:04:07 02/26/22 (1)

You would know, that happens to be your mind set. - geoffkait 13:37:17 02/26/22 (0)

RE: You sir are seriously deluded - Analog Scott 09:14:45 02/25/22 (0)

RE: Easy answer - Time_Stands_Still 17:16:33 02/24/22 (4)

Argue with the wall however you please - E-Stat 18:28:07 02/24/22 (3)

RE: Argue with the wall however you please - Time_Stands_Still 18:36:16 02/24/22 (2)

In all fairness...- - Analog Scott 11:07:52 02/26/22 (1)

logical mixup - geoffkait 17:22:34 02/26/22 (0)

Do you know the difference between an MP3 and a CD? - Analog Scott 16:06:01 02/17/22 (4)

Time to reread the text - E-Stat 16:25:47 02/17/22 (3)

I reread it. Nothing changed, no one says SACD sounds better than CD - Analog Scott 16:42:20 02/17/22 (2)

Apparently - E-Stat 17:08:18 02/17/22 (1)

I understand all of that. Apparently you don't understand that - Analog Scott 18:21:39 02/17/22 (0)

Theory vs reality - geoffkait 03:49:12 02/17/22 (0)

are you actually incapable of telling the difference between a strawman and an analogy? - Analog Scott 19:23:23 02/16/22 (0)

RE: You may proselytize all you wish! - Time_Stands_Still 10:54:17 02/16/22 (10)

Believe whatever you will - E-Stat 11:24:33 02/16/22 (9)

RE: Believe whatever you will - Time_Stands_Still 15:39:07 02/16/22 (8)

RE: Believe whatever you will - E-Stat 15:46:21 02/16/22 (7)

RE: Believe whatever you will - Time_Stands_Still 15:52:34 02/16/22 (6)

For some odd reason - E-Stat 15:59:39 02/16/22 (5)

RE: For some odd reason - Time_Stands_Still 16:12:59 02/16/22 (4)

RE: For some odd reason - E-Stat 16:14:58 02/16/22 (3)

RE: For some odd reason - Analog Scott 19:36:29 02/16/22 (2)

You're wearing out your straw man - E-Stat 19:42:14 02/16/22 (1)

dang, even your tap dancing sucks - Analog Scott 20:18:42 02/16/22 (0)

Quality of the recording/mastering is FAR more important ... - Feanor 04:28:38 02/16/22 (5)

MP3 was bound to rear its ugly head sooner or later. Next up, controlled blind testing. - geoffkait 15:57:08 02/17/22 (0)

I dunno man... - Analog Scott 20:41:43 02/16/22 (0)

RE: Quality of the recording/mastering is FAR more important ... - Time_Stands_Still 09:53:18 02/16/22 (2)

RE: Quality of the recording/mastering is FAR more important ... - Freo-1 06:54:05 02/18/22 (0)

RE: Quality of the recording/mastering is FAR more important ... - geoffkait 16:01:16 02/16/22 (0)

It was never claimed that CD was "Hi-Rez", they only claimed it was "Perfect Sound Forever". - peppy m. 02/15/2215:04:36 02/15/22 (3)

"'Hi-Rez' trumps Perfection" - Right you are! [nt] ;-) - Chris from Lafayette 01:19:05 02/16/22 (2)

Did you say "trump?!" I am feeling very triggered! - Analog Scott 20:50:40 02/16/22 (1)

Oh - THAT kind of trump! [nt] ;-) - Chris from Lafayette 00:24:01 02/17/22 (0)

File under: Reasons why audiophiles sometimes don' get the results they were expecting. - geoffkait 13:59:05 02/15/22 (0)

I hope my post was informative and thought provoking at best. - Roseval 13:32:55 02/15/22 (0)

The Real Issue is RFI.......... - Todd Krieger 13:17:30 02/15/22 (17)

RE: The Real Issue is RFI.......... - roberttcan 17:19:36 03/2/22 (0)

I should ask this - geoffkait 02:38:44 02/22/22 (4)

RE: I should ask this - Todd Krieger 23:18:32 02/22/22 (3)

RE: I should ask this - geoffkait 03:27:39 02/23/22 (2)

RE: I should ask this - Todd Krieger 16:37:43 02/23/22 (1)

RE: I should ask this - geoffkait 04:31:13 02/24/22 (0)

RE: The Real Issue is RFI.......... - Crazy Dave 07:00:48 02/17/22 (3)

RE: The Real Issue is RFI.......... - geoffkait 13:45:00 02/18/22 (1)

RE: The Real Issue is RFI.......... - Crazy Dave 12:32:06 02/20/22 (0)

RE: The Real Issue is RFI.......... - Todd Krieger 12:57:15 02/18/22 (0)

RE: The Real Issue is RFI.......... - geoffkait 14:57:48 02/16/22 (0)

Mr. Kreiger is correct.... - rickmcinnis@dogwoodfabrics.com 12:10:15 02/16/22 (3)

RE: Mr. Kreiger is correct.... - Todd Krieger 12:25:23 02/18/22 (2)

I personally think a dedicated transport would be even better, they tend to emit less RFI than a slow computer - geoffkait 11:41:43 03/8/22 (0)

That is and interesting thought! (nt) - Crazy Dave 12:36:03 02/20/22 (0)

evidence is needed - Story 14:57:02 02/15/22 (1)

RE: evidence is needed - Todd Krieger 23:31:17 02/15/22 (0)

RE: Why the CD is the original Hi-Rez. and why you don't need anything higher - dbphd 11:43:44 02/15/22 (0)

" because it was recorded poorly, mastered and engineered poorly " - Story 11:06:27 02/15/22 (1)

RE: " because it was recorded poorly, mastered and engineered poorly " - roberttcan 07:58:32 03/4/22 (0)

Follow Ups

It was never claimed that CD was "Hi-Rez", they only claimed it was "Perfect Sound Forever". - peppy m. 02/15/2215:04:36 02/15/22 (3)

"'Hi-Rez' trumps Perfection" - Right you are! [nt] ;-) - Chris from Lafayette 01:19:05 02/16/22 (2)

Did you say "trump?!" I am feeling very triggered! - Analog Scott 20:50:40 02/16/22 (1)

Oh - THAT kind of trump! [nt] ;-) - Chris from Lafayette 00:24:01 02/17/22 (0)

Post a Message!