|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
|
|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
In Reply to: Tidal HIFI v. Tidal Master? posted by Mel on June 23, 2020 at 09:36:42:
Even though the bit depth of the Masters files is 24 bits, you're not getting much more resolution than the 16-bit HiFi files because the lower bits are used to store the folded ultrasonic content in pseudo-noise.
I'm not a fan of MQA either, so I switched to Qobuz. Qobuz is better for classical (IMHO) and streams full hi-res files unadulterated by MQA's folding.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Masters could sound worse than HiFi if you don't have MQA decoding - Dave_K 06/23/2011:44:05 06/23/20 (8)
- RE: Masters could sound worse than HiFi if you don't have MQA decoding - cawson@onetel.com 13:20:32 06/23/20 (7)
- RE: Masters could sound worse than HiFi if you don't have MQA decoding - PAR 16:05:31 06/23/20 (6)
- RE: Masters could sound worse than HiFi if you don't have MQA decoding - cawson@onetel.com 02:50:43 06/24/20 (5)
- RE: Masters could sound worse than HiFi if you don't have MQA decoding - PAR 03:08:47 06/24/20 (4)
- RE: Masters could sound worse than HiFi if you don't have MQA decoding - cawson@onetel.com 11:31:34 06/24/20 (3)
- RE: Masters could sound worse than HiFi if you don't have MQA decoding - PAR 15:43:00 06/24/20 (2)
- RE: Masters could sound worse than HiFi if you don't have MQA decoding - cawson@onetel.com 08:47:42 06/25/20 (1)
- RE: Masters could sound worse than HiFi if you don't have MQA decoding - PAR 10:17:43 06/25/20 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
