RE: It means that CDs are obsolete. They have never been what I would call "high end".

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Perplexed by how subtle DAC change is - Rick_S22 11:20:37 12/17/13 (91)

not really perplexing ... - TBone 07:11:58 12/20/13 (0)

RE: Perplexed by how subtle DAC change is - rkeman 05:46:01 12/20/13 (0)

Why not try the dac with a pc ? - beppe61 00:30:29 12/20/13 (0)

Of course, you realize what this means? - jedrider 13:55:11 12/19/13 (27)

Oh Great! Hallelujah! Perfect sound forever! Oww I might be onto something ... hasn't been used has it? ;-) nt - bjh 09:41:15 12/28/13 (0)

It means that CDs are obsolete. They have never been what I would call "high end". - Tony Lauck 10:09:57 12/20/13 (25)

My CD playback is pretty fine.. nt - Elizabeth 17:46:13 12/29/13 (0)

RE: It means that CDs are obsolete. They have never been what I would call "high end". - morricab 14:13:31 12/21/13 (15)

RE: It means that CDs are obsolete. They have never been what I would call "high end". - Tony Lauck 16:06:35 12/21/13 (14)

RE: It means that CDs are obsolete. They have never been what I would call "high end". - morricab 10:19:14 12/27/13 (2)

RE: It means that CDs are obsolete. They have never been what I would call "high end". - Tony Lauck 11:14:20 12/27/13 (1)

RE: It means that CDs are obsolete. They have never been what I would call "high end". - morricab 13:10:57 12/29/13 (0)

"level 69 audiophool" - TBone 06:49:58 12/24/13 (10)

RE: "level 69 audiophool" - Tony Lauck 08:56:29 12/24/13 (9)

RE: "level 69 audiophool" - morricab 10:47:25 12/27/13 (4)

RE: "level 69 audiophool" - bjh 08:37:11 12/28/13 (3)

RE: "level 69 audiophool" - morricab 13:13:20 12/29/13 (2)

RE: "level 69 audiophool" - bjh 04:39:16 12/30/13 (1)

RE: "level 69 audiophool" - morricab 12:28:00 12/30/13 (0)

consider this ... - TBone 13:07:44 12/24/13 (3)

RE: consider this ... - Tony Lauck 14:20:18 12/24/13 (2)

RE: consider this ... - morricab 13:23:54 12/29/13 (0)

RE: consider this ... - TBone 15:47:43 12/24/13 (0)

RE: It means that CDs are obsolete. They have never been what I would call "high end". - oldmkvi 08:07:17 12/21/13 (7)

RE: It means that CDs are obsolete. They have never been what I would call "high end". - Tony Lauck 08:51:08 12/21/13 (6)

RE: It means that CDs are obsolete. They have never been what I would call "high end". - rrob 12/23/1305:57:43 12/23/13 (4)

RE: It means that CDs are obsolete. They have never been what I would call "high end". - Tony Lauck 07:33:17 12/23/13 (3)

RE: It means that CDs are obsolete. They have never been what I would call "high end". - rrob 11:22:20 12/23/13 (2)

RE: It means that CDs are obsolete. They have never been what I would call "high end". - Tony Lauck 11:45:58 12/23/13 (1)

RE: It means that CDs are obsolete. They have never been what I would call "high end". - rrob 12:07:48 12/23/13 (0)

Thanks Tony- Digital is complicated! nt - oldmkvi 09:25:49 12/21/13 (0)

Not surprising - audioengr 11:09:03 12/19/13 (9)

RE: Not surprising - oldmkvi 09:39:58 12/21/13 (4)

RE: Not surprising - audioengr 10:24:47 12/21/13 (3)

Thanks! Can you recommend Brand of Product? For Mac. TIA! nt - oldmkvi 11:44:16 12/21/13 (2)

RE: I wonder who makes a reclocker??? nt - Bob_C 19:09:55 12/23/13 (0)

I found Empirical Audio Synchro Mesh. nt - oldmkvi 08:25:04 12/22/13 (0)

You don't want me to comment do you?....................nt - Cut-Throat 11:57:38 12/19/13 (3)

Jitter - audioengr 12:41:53 12/20/13 (2)

RE: Jitter - Bromo33333 12:43:22 12/20/13 (1)

RE: Jitter - audioengr 13:33:36 12/20/13 (0)

RE: Perplexed by how subtle DAC change is - morricab 12:52:03 12/18/13 (1)

RE: Perplexed by how subtle DAC change is - Tweaker456 13:34:49 08/12/14 (0)

Agree with Most of the Responses Here.... - Todd Krieger 12:23:41 12/18/13 (0)

RE: Perplexed by how subtle DAC change is - bjh 12:12:42 12/18/13 (0)

RE: Perplexed by how subtle DAC change is - Rick_S22 07:50:41 12/18/13 (2)

Fully digital? - Vic D 00:41:34 12/20/13 (0)

" My PC and laptop are set up for digital photography editing " - beppe61 00:37:41 12/20/13 (0)

RE: I tried the Cary DAC 100t - navman 07:39:30 12/18/13 (14)

Schiit Gungnir - dandaroy 21:47:37 12/18/13 (5)

RE: Schiit Gungnir - navman 06:42:04 12/19/13 (4)

RE: Schiit Gungnir - dandaroy 10:56:35 12/19/13 (3)

RE: 200-400 hours - navman 11:22:44 12/19/13 (2)

holy mother of god! - dandaroy 21:05:45 12/19/13 (1)

RE: holy mother of god! - navman 21:44:54 12/19/13 (0)

RE: I tried the Cary DAC 100t - niws 20:47:03 12/18/13 (1)

RE: Bifrost vs Micromega - navman 06:40:54 12/19/13 (0)

RE: I tried the Cary DAC 100t - bjh 12:31:23 12/18/13 (5)

RE: I tried the Cary DAC 100t - navman 18:16:48 12/18/13 (4)

RE: I tried the Cary DAC 100t - TubeDriver 10:01:01 12/19/13 (3)

RE: I tried the Cary DAC 100t - navman 14:48:33 12/19/13 (2)

RE: I tried the Cary DAC 100t - TubeDriver 17:58:42 12/19/13 (1)

RE: I tried the Cary DAC 100t - navman 18:29:06 12/19/13 (0)

The last reviewer who said sony and marantz sacd players sound exactly the same.... - jeromelang 01:47:59 12/18/13 (1)

...and your point was.....? nt - Tom Schuman 05:31:44 12/18/13 (0)

RE: Perplexed by how subtle DAC change is - Vic D 22:07:50 12/17/13 (0)

loose it - mbnx01 21:24:57 12/17/13 (0)

I had Adcom DA700 (Used $250) bought Bryston $2,300 and was NOT impressed. returned it. More: - Elizabeth 21:04:01 12/17/13 (13)

RE: I had Adcom DA700 (Used $250) bought Bryston $2,300 and was NOT impressed. returned it. More: - RGA 17:10:14 12/18/13 (11)

RE: I had Adcom DA700 (Used $250) bought Bryston $2,300 and was NOT impressed. returned it. More: - rick_m 07:16:53 12/19/13 (1)

RE: I had Adcom DA700 (Used $250) bought Bryston $2,300 and was NOT impressed. returned it. More: - RGA 18:08:01 12/19/13 (0)

why is it somebody is always trying to sell me something? Not complaining as much as perplexed? - Elizabeth 06:01:43 12/19/13 (8)

You live in a capitalist society. nt - Tony Lauck 10:40:10 12/22/13 (0)

Buy Monster Cable, Buy Monster, oh , never mind… - oldmkvi 08:27:25 12/22/13 (0)

I think that people are just trying to share what they have found. - Bromo33333 17:57:50 12/19/13 (0)

RE: why is it somebody is always trying to sell me something? Not complaining as much as perplexed? - RGA 17:50:29 12/19/13 (3)

But the story is four years old, and is just to show the op my similar predicament - Elizabeth 19:35:01 12/19/13 (2)

RE: But the story is four years old, and is just to show the op my similar predicament - RGA 20:51:03 12/19/13 (1)

No problem. ;) - Elizabeth 10:55:57 12/20/13 (0)

RE: why is it somebody is always trying to sell me something? Not complaining as much as perplexed? - Old Listener 09:05:05 12/19/13 (0)

RE: I had Adcom DA700 (Used $250) bought Bryston $2,300 and was NOT impressed. returned it. More: - bjh 12:16:56 12/18/13 (0)

RE: Perplexed by how subtle DAC change is - Rick_S22 16:39:29 12/17/13 (2)

keep in mind that any DAC is optimised to sound best with a certain transport or source technology in mind... - Tom Schuman 05:37:21 12/18/13 (0)

No longer running a pre-amp now........................ - Cut-Throat 17:38:13 12/17/13 (0)

I have had a lot of different DACs in my System......................... - Cut-Throat 15:03:34 12/17/13 (1)

I agree with Cut-throat - jult52 11:52:42 08/13/14 (0)

RE: Perplexed by how subtle DAC change is - abs1 14:42:11 12/17/13 (0)

Agree with Tom - E-Stat 14:34:19 12/17/13 (0)

Well.since the CD2 is a near-great player, hard to improve on it with an outboard DAC - Tom Schuman 13:47:21 12/17/13 (0)

RE: Perplexed by how subtle DAC change is - Awe-d-o-file 13:42:13 12/17/13 (0)

Return it! - Crazy Dave 11:59:18 12/17/13 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: It means that CDs are obsolete. They have never been what I would call "high end". - rrob 12/23/1305:57:43 12/23/13 (4)

RE: It means that CDs are obsolete. They have never been what I would call "high end". - Tony Lauck 07:33:17 12/23/13 (3)

RE: It means that CDs are obsolete. They have never been what I would call "high end". - rrob 11:22:20 12/23/13 (2)

RE: It means that CDs are obsolete. They have never been what I would call "high end". - Tony Lauck 11:45:58 12/23/13 (1)

RE: It means that CDs are obsolete. They have never been what I would call "high end". - rrob 12:07:48 12/23/13 (0)

Post a Message!