Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
In Reply to: RE: Low levels - bad? posted by Eric B on May 24, 2011 at 21:06:43:
Hey Eric,
If the master is deficient I have no idea how to improve upon it.
I can ignore it, but I can't improve it.
Best regards,
Jim Smith
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - Queen remasters: Disappointing news - Quint 12:31:12 05/23/11 (66)
- RE: Queen remasters: Disappointing news - Eric B 20:42:46 05/24/11 (2)
- Man......... - Todd Krieger 19:37:29 05/25/11 (0)
- See my follow-up posts - Quint 03:10:08 05/25/11 (0)
- On related subject - "sitting in the closet", mentioned in this thread at least twice,... - carcass93 09:16:33 05/24/11 (1)
- RE: On related subject - "sitting in the closet", mentioned in this thread at least twice,... - Quint 09:55:07 05/24/11 (0)
- RE: Queen remasters: Disappointing news - Regor Ladan 06:58:59 05/24/11 (3)
- RE: Queen remasters: Disappointing news - Todd Krieger 19:35:41 05/25/11 (1)
- RE: Queen remasters: Disappointing news - Regor Ladan 21:02:07 05/25/11 (0)
- In the final equation, I think the payoff was worth the compromise - Quint 07:43:35 05/24/11 (0)
- Slight amendment - Quint 05:13:02 05/24/11 (2)
- RE: Slight amendment - Todd Krieger 19:29:49 05/25/11 (1)
- Uh, no . . . - Quint 04:00:07 05/26/11 (0)
- find someone to trade discs - Joe Murphy Jr 22:23:46 05/23/11 (0)
- RE: Queen remasters: Disappointing news - Regor Ladan 21:43:51 05/23/11 (2)
- After that second listen, are you starting to prefer the Hollywoods? [NT] - Quint 05:08:42 05/24/11 (1)
- RE: After that second listen, are you starting to prefer the Hollywoods? [NT] - Regor Ladan 07:00:22 05/24/11 (0)
- RE: Queen remasters: Disappointing news - Todd Krieger 19:24:03 05/23/11 (31)
- agree - Joe Murphy Jr 21:23:47 05/23/11 (0)
- RE: Queen remasters: Disappointing news - Regor Ladan 21:07:41 05/23/11 (24)
- RE: Queen remasters: Disappointing news - Todd Krieger 19:20:45 05/25/11 (1)
- RE: Queen remasters: Disappointing news - Regor Ladan 21:09:48 05/25/11 (0)
- other sampling rates are better - Joe Murphy Jr 21:38:07 05/23/11 (21)
- RE: other sampling rates are better - Regor Ladan 21:42:40 05/23/11 (20)
- disagree - Joe Murphy Jr 22:11:54 05/23/11 (19)
- RE: disagree - Regor Ladan 22:29:21 05/23/11 (18)
- it's a "numbers" game - Joe Murphy Jr 00:02:45 05/24/11 (17)
- RE: it's a "numbers" game - Tony Lauck 18:48:28 05/24/11 (16)
- RE: it's a "numbers" game - Regor Ladan 19:16:17 05/24/11 (15)
- RE: it's a "numbers" game - Tony Lauck 19:35:28 05/24/11 (14)
- RE: it's a "numbers" game - Eric B 20:18:03 05/24/11 (2)
- Waltz for Debbie - Tony Lauck 14:02:38 05/25/11 (1)
- RE: Waltz for Debbie - Eric B 16:58:27 05/25/11 (0)
- RE: it's a "numbers" game - Regor Ladan 19:43:12 05/24/11 (10)
- RE: it's a "numbers" game - Tony Lauck 14:14:11 05/25/11 (2)
- RE: it's a "numbers" game - Regor Ladan 16:38:58 05/25/11 (1)
- RE: it's a "numbers" game - Tony Lauck 19:25:35 05/25/11 (0)
- RE: it's a "numbers" game - Charles Hansen 20:51:11 05/24/11 (6)
- RE: it's a "numbers" game - Regor Ladan 07:46:51 05/25/11 (5)
- RE: it's a "numbers" game - Charles Hansen 08:12:26 05/25/11 (4)
- RE: it's a "numbers" game - Todd Krieger 00:10:02 05/26/11 (2)
- RE: it's a "numbers" game - Regor Ladan 14:41:24 05/26/11 (0)
- RE: it's a "numbers" game - Charles Hansen 09:40:16 05/26/11 (0)
- RE: it's a "numbers" game - Regor Ladan 16:45:42 05/25/11 (0)
- RE: Queen remasters: Disappointing news - Quint 19:28:30 05/23/11 (4)
- RE: Queen remasters: Disappointing news - Todd Krieger 19:59:20 05/23/11 (3)
- RE: Queen remasters: Disappointing news - Regor Ladan 21:04:17 05/23/11 (2)
- RE: Queen remasters: Disappointing news - Todd Krieger 19:24:25 05/25/11 (1)
- RE: Queen remasters: Disappointing news - Regor Ladan 21:14:05 05/25/11 (0)
- RE: Queen remasters: Disappointing news - Regor Ladan 16:47:04 05/23/11 (15)
- Low levels - bad? - Jim Smith 21:05:22 05/23/11 (10)
- RE: Low levels - bad? - Eric B 21:06:43 05/24/11 (8)
- RE: Low levels - bad? - Todd Krieger 00:06:23 05/26/11 (6)
- RE: Low levels - bad? - Eric B 17:10:26 05/26/11 (5)
- RE: Low levels - bad? - Regor Ladan 17:30:40 05/26/11 (4)
- RE: Low levels - bad? - Tony Lauck 10:26:51 05/30/11 (3)
- RE: Low levels - bad? - Regor Ladan 16:54:11 05/30/11 (1)
- RE: Low levels - bad? - Tony Lauck 17:20:30 05/30/11 (0)
- RE: Low levels - bad? - Regor Ladan 16:48:43 05/30/11 (0)
- RE: Low levels - bad? - Jim Smith 05/24/1121:30:02 05/24/11 (0)
- RE: Low levels - bad? - Regor Ladan 21:18:55 05/23/11 (0)
- RE: Queen remasters: Disappointing news - Quint 17:04:51 05/23/11 (3)
- RE: Queen remasters: Disappointing news - Regor Ladan 17:39:14 05/23/11 (2)
- RE: Queen remasters: Disappointing news - Quint 18:28:26 05/23/11 (1)
- RE: Queen remasters: Disappointing news - Regor Ladan 18:39:05 05/23/11 (0)
- Sometimes happens with older material - Jon L 12:35:17 05/23/11 (1)
- RE: Sometimes happens with older material - Tony Lauck 19:09:34 05/24/11 (0)
Follow Ups
- RE: Low levels - bad? - Jim Smith 05/24/1121:30:02 05/24/11 (0)