In Reply to: RE: Queen remasters: Disappointing news posted by Regor Ladan on May 23, 2011 at 16:47:04:
As a rule, a lower average level is a sure sign of less compression - 9 times out of 10.
Turning it up should yield a more musically involving sound. And it should sound less thin (unless there is an inherent problem in the recording)
Case in point - play any Reference Recordings orchestral piece. Then play the same piece from another label. The other labels will be louder, which is almost certainly some compression - squeezing the soft-to-loud delta together.
That being said, maybe the Hollywood set is the 1 out of 10.
Best regards,
Jim Smith
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Low levels - bad? - Jim Smith 05/23/1121:05:22 05/23/11 (10)
- RE: Low levels - bad? - Eric B 21:06:43 05/24/11 (8)
- RE: Low levels - bad? - Todd Krieger 00:06:23 05/26/11 (6)
- RE: Low levels - bad? - Eric B 17:10:26 05/26/11 (5)
- RE: Low levels - bad? - Regor Ladan 17:30:40 05/26/11 (4)
- RE: Low levels - bad? - Tony Lauck 10:26:51 05/30/11 (3)
- RE: Low levels - bad? - Regor Ladan 16:54:11 05/30/11 (1)
- RE: Low levels - bad? - Tony Lauck 17:20:30 05/30/11 (0)
- RE: Low levels - bad? - Regor Ladan 16:48:43 05/30/11 (0)
- RE: Low levels - bad? - Jim Smith 21:30:02 05/24/11 (0)
- RE: Low levels - bad? - Regor Ladan 21:18:55 05/23/11 (0)