Toshiba 3950 compared to DI/O

Digital Drive

Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it.

To all DI/O owners: try the 3950 or 60! It is the real thing and is miles ahead of my self-modded DI/O (which has most of the standard mods but is not up to par with the Mensa version). There really is no comparison. I'm stunned that $60 can get this kind of performance: detail resolution, musicality, PRAT, soundstaging. The only area where the 3950 falls short of the DI/O is in bass power (but it's ahead of the DI/O in bass resolution & punchiness). Be aware that it needs at least 20 hours to burn in; out of the box I was unimpressed. The posters here are correct: the 3950/60 has entirely changed this game. My sincere thanks to Rosconey, Vinnie, John Swenson, and others.

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Atma-Sphere Music Systems, Inc.

Topic - Toshiba 3950 compared to DI/O - Chuck 07:35:59 03/10/04 (7)

I agree, but....... - StevieRay 08:01:35 03/10/04 (6)

Re: I agree, but....... - Story 08:14:10 03/10/04 (5)

Re: I agree, but....... - Sonick 16:08:16 03/10/04 (0)

Which 3950 mod approach do you recommend? - ModNewbie 09:22:53 03/10/04 (1)

Re: Which 3950 mod approach do you recommend? - Story 09:37:06 03/10/04 (0)

Re: I agree, but....... - jkwinn 08:25:24 03/10/04 (1)

I agree . . . - Jim A. 09:32:02 03/10/04 (0)

You can not post to an archived thread.