In Reply to: RE: About depth of field with digital posted by Thorsten on May 8, 2015 at 18:02:24:
Hi, and thanks again for the kind reply.
Sorry but i have still not learned how to quote here
" Some products have it. You can nowadays get playback software that allows almost any type of filter to be added and also hosts so-called VST Plugins, which are the standard for Pro-Audio.
You could for example get very good reverb plugins.
One of my favourite plugins is called re-life which can be to re-expand the dynamic range on material that is hopelessly compressed "
Very interesting. I have to study them more.
It has been important for me to realize that soundstage depth is always the result of some kind of digital processing in the D to A conversion.
I did not this for sure.
This makes digital processing a must for me. So i will study more of this very interesting aspect.
> Who wants a flat sound ? nobody for sure.
" Then try not to go to a concert hall (most) and sit far back "
Very interesting ... but then Who wants " to go to a concert hall (most) and sit far back " ?
I would like to be on the podium by the director !
Ok ... third row is ok.
> Of course also i do not like the usual digital glare, lack of
> PRAT and so on ...
" I do not think "digital glare" is usual "
i thought differently... it could be the case that i do not know what i am talking about. I am very confused. The more i read the more i get confused. It is a very very complex issue.
" PRAT is difficult topic. You know for example how that famous Turntable achieves PRAT?
Ciao T "
No .. which turntable ? i am not at all on analog. I am lazy and the solution of all my cds ripped on a nas is the only one that i can imagine. Also because it is not sadly my case but i am sure that excellent sound with digital can be obtained.
And one day ... perhaps ...
Thanks a lot again Mr. Thorsten for the always kind and precious advice.
Kind regards,
bg
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: About depth of field with digital - beppe61 05/8/1522:35:52 05/8/15 (13)
- RE: About depth of field with digital - Thorsten 01:50:40 05/9/15 (9)
- RE: About depth of field with digital - TBone 09:12:21 05/11/15 (1)
- RE: About depth of field with digital - Thorsten 18:17:49 05/11/15 (0)
- RE: About depth of field with digital - beppe61 05:33:41 05/9/15 (6)
- RE: About depth of field with digital - Thorsten 06:30:30 05/9/15 (5)
- RE: About depth of field with digital - beppe61 06:50:14 05/9/15 (4)
- RE: About depth of field with digital - Thorsten 21:58:27 05/9/15 (3)
- RE: About depth of field with digital - beppe61 00:54:44 05/10/15 (2)
- RE: About depth of field with digital - Thorsten 11:09:14 05/10/15 (1)
- RE: About depth of field with digital - beppe61 13:29:15 05/10/15 (0)
- RE: About depth of field with digital - Daverz 23:21:05 05/8/15 (2)
- RE: About depth of field with digital - Tony Lauck 08:49:41 05/9/15 (0)
- RE: About depth of field with digital - beppe61 00:41:14 05/9/15 (0)