|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
|
|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
In Reply to: RE: About depth of field with digital posted by Thorsten on May 8, 2015 at 12:34:55:
> > The bottom line is, if a DAC delivers subjectively improved "depth of field (DOF)" on any recording, it must manipulate the signal it is given. < <
Perhaps, but if perceived DOF remains identical when demonstrating an identically mixed CD with it's related LP ... nothing then is seemingly being manipulated, correct?
> > Early digitals high order 1fs LC filters mucked DOF up big time, just as many speaker with complex and high order crossovers do. < <
Or in my experience, many speakers w/multiples of drivers also demonstrate a certain phaseyness (not a word I know) which makes DOF almost impossible to differentiate. But that's yet another discussion ... early CD pitched far more balls than strikes.
tb1
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: About depth of field with digital - TBone 05/8/1512:57:31 05/8/15 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
