In Reply to: RE: About depth of field with digital posted by beppe61 on May 8, 2015 at 06:21:38:
![]()
Beppe,
See my last post in answer to T-bone. Most recommended the vinyl mono version for absolute distortion free natural sound/stage. Though the CD is magnificent also.
25 years experience with digital: digital is digital regardless of price, tweaking, upgrading, rumours on the Asylum, hifi magazines, advertisements.
All DAC's in my opinion sound the same, you cannot have a fault in the DAC because then it doesn't do anything, compare digital TV, the DAC must be faultless , if not picture gone or distorted. I am afraid you want something digital is not capable of. I quit some time ago and spend my money on nicer things, money enough but money can't buy me satisfactory digital reproduction.
Biggest differences imo after the DAC, one lousy opamp can destroy everything. But that is almost never the case as tweaking with valve output has proven.
It's all in the software, omit bad CD's. if you bought a bad one throw it in the bin, complaining to the music industry senseless, I complained several times, letters, e-mail, no response or arrogant reply like you must renew your DAC, useless, arrogant.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: About depth of field with digital - huubdas 05/8/1507:43:33 05/8/15 (9)
- RE: About depth of field with digital - beppe61 09:54:19 05/8/15 (4)
- RE: About depth of field with digital - huubdas 15:17:33 05/8/15 (3)
- you're confused ... - TBone 15:35:37 05/8/15 (2)
- RE: you're confused ... - huubdas 16:36:56 05/8/15 (0)
- RE: you're confused ... - huubdas 16:25:20 05/8/15 (0)
- RE: About depth of field with digital - TBone 09:10:50 05/8/15 (3)
- RE: About depth of field with digital - huubdas 15:44:39 05/8/15 (2)
- skill testing question ... - TBone 18:21:46 05/8/15 (1)
- RE: skill testing question ... - huubdas 20:34:13 05/8/15 (0)