In Reply to: RE: 20-bit processing posted by J. Phelan on July 16, 2009 at 15:31:50:
There is *no such thing* as 24-bit ADCs. You should know this. The last four bits on a (24-bit) ladder are not functional.
Most of the newest converters use delta-sigma modulators running at a very high oversampling rate and a bit depth around 4 to 8 bits. These have sufficient performance in the audio range that their performance is somewhat constrained by the 24 bit word length. Similarly on DACs. Accordingly, manufacturers are beginning to offer 32 bit converters. It is fair to say that the low order bits of a 24 bit converter are functional, albeit less functional and certainly less important than the higher order bits.
"Finally, with intermediate calculations being done on a 20-bit - not 16 bit - capture, we shouldn't have to dither/noise-shape.
This statement is simply false and demonstrates both practical and theoretical ignorance.
Tony Lauck
"Diversity is the law of nature; no two entities in this universe are uniform." - P.R. Sarkar
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: 20-bit processing - Tony Lauck 07/16/0917:48:57 07/16/09 (17)
- RE: 20-bit processing - Werner 01:21:17 07/17/09 (1)
- Why 32 bit converters - Tony Lauck 08:31:03 07/17/09 (0)
- RE: 20-bit processing - J. Phelan 18:02:57 07/16/09 (14)
- RE: 20-bit processing - Todd Krieger 19:18:11 07/16/09 (0)
- RE: 20-bit processing - DaveK 18:27:01 07/16/09 (12)
- RE: 20-bit processing - J. Phelan 19:05:48 07/16/09 (6)
- RE: 20-bit processing - DaveK 20:39:33 07/16/09 (5)
- RE: 20-bit processing - J. Phelan 21:11:17 07/16/09 (4)
- RE: 20-bit processing - DaveK 21:39:57 07/16/09 (3)
- RE: 20-bit processing - J. Phelan 22:20:39 07/16/09 (2)
- RE: 20-bit processing - Tony Lauck 19:55:26 07/17/09 (1)
- RE: 20-bit processing - J. Phelan 20:17:18 07/17/09 (0)
- RE: 20-bit processing - Tony Lauck 18:47:12 07/16/09 (4)
- RE: 20-bit processing - J. Phelan 19:12:41 07/16/09 (3)
- Many others ? - Metralla 04:26:22 07/17/09 (2)
- RE: Many others ? - J. Phelan 05:45:14 07/17/09 (1)
- RE: Many others ? - Tony Lauck 20:49:38 07/17/09 (0)