In Reply to: RE: 20-bit processing posted by J. Phelan on July 16, 2009 at 00:56:26:
Most 16 bit recordings sound better when dithered. I base this on my experience with many tape transfers to 44/16 format and a few original digital recordings as well, where the final stage in production involves reduction of 44/32 or 44/24 material down to 44/16. There are a variety of dither algorithms in my toolkit and I choose the one that sounds best for each recording.
Analog noise may mask the quantization distortion caused by lack of dither, but analog noise generally has a Gaussian probability distribution and hence is only an approximation to what is needed to eliminate all distortion and noise modulation, a triangular probability distribution precisely calibrated as to its amplitude. Even better would be subtractive dither, but this requires a decoder to subtract out the dither noise during playback and there is no standard non-proprietary way of doing this. (With subtractive dither one gets the benefit of dither with no noise penalty.)
Tony Lauck
"Diversity is the law of nature; no two entities in this universe are uniform." - P.R. Sarkar
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: 20-bit processing - Tony Lauck 07/16/0910:10:05 07/16/09 (23)
- RE: 20-bit processing - J. Phelan 12:39:52 07/16/09 (22)
- RE: 20-bit processing - Tony Lauck 13:51:03 07/16/09 (21)
- RE: 20-bit processing - J. Phelan 15:31:50 07/16/09 (20)
- RE: 20-bit processing - Todd Krieger 18:55:11 07/16/09 (1)
- RE: 20-bit processing - J. Phelan 19:09:31 07/16/09 (0)
- RE: 20-bit processing - Tony Lauck 17:48:57 07/16/09 (17)
- RE: 20-bit processing - Werner 01:21:17 07/17/09 (1)
- Why 32 bit converters - Tony Lauck 08:31:03 07/17/09 (0)
- RE: 20-bit processing - J. Phelan 18:02:57 07/16/09 (14)
- RE: 20-bit processing - Todd Krieger 19:18:11 07/16/09 (0)
- RE: 20-bit processing - DaveK 18:27:01 07/16/09 (12)
- RE: 20-bit processing - J. Phelan 19:05:48 07/16/09 (6)
- RE: 20-bit processing - DaveK 20:39:33 07/16/09 (5)
- RE: 20-bit processing - J. Phelan 21:11:17 07/16/09 (4)
- RE: 20-bit processing - DaveK 21:39:57 07/16/09 (3)
- RE: 20-bit processing - J. Phelan 22:20:39 07/16/09 (2)
- RE: 20-bit processing - Tony Lauck 19:55:26 07/17/09 (1)
- RE: 20-bit processing - J. Phelan 20:17:18 07/17/09 (0)
- RE: 20-bit processing - Tony Lauck 18:47:12 07/16/09 (4)
- RE: 20-bit processing - J. Phelan 19:12:41 07/16/09 (3)
- Many others ? - Metralla 04:26:22 07/17/09 (2)
- RE: Many others ? - J. Phelan 05:45:14 07/17/09 (1)
- RE: Many others ? - Tony Lauck 20:49:38 07/17/09 (0)