In Reply to: RE: 20-bit processing posted by Todd Krieger on July 15, 2009 at 23:56:02:
Should...should...should. But might not.....
The bottom line is that we don't *have* to dither !! The Stereophile link (and common sense) shows why.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: 20-bit processing - J. Phelan 07/16/0900:56:26 07/16/09 (25)
- RE: 20-bit processing - Todd Krieger 18:39:20 07/16/09 (0)
- RE: 20-bit processing - Tony Lauck 10:10:05 07/16/09 (23)
- RE: 20-bit processing - J. Phelan 12:39:52 07/16/09 (22)
- RE: 20-bit processing - Tony Lauck 13:51:03 07/16/09 (21)
- RE: 20-bit processing - J. Phelan 15:31:50 07/16/09 (20)
- RE: 20-bit processing - Todd Krieger 18:55:11 07/16/09 (1)
- RE: 20-bit processing - J. Phelan 19:09:31 07/16/09 (0)
- RE: 20-bit processing - Tony Lauck 17:48:57 07/16/09 (17)
- RE: 20-bit processing - Werner 01:21:17 07/17/09 (1)
- Why 32 bit converters - Tony Lauck 08:31:03 07/17/09 (0)
- RE: 20-bit processing - J. Phelan 18:02:57 07/16/09 (14)
- RE: 20-bit processing - Todd Krieger 19:18:11 07/16/09 (0)
- RE: 20-bit processing - DaveK 18:27:01 07/16/09 (12)
- RE: 20-bit processing - J. Phelan 19:05:48 07/16/09 (6)
- RE: 20-bit processing - DaveK 20:39:33 07/16/09 (5)
- RE: 20-bit processing - J. Phelan 21:11:17 07/16/09 (4)
- RE: 20-bit processing - DaveK 21:39:57 07/16/09 (3)
- RE: 20-bit processing - J. Phelan 22:20:39 07/16/09 (2)
- RE: 20-bit processing - Tony Lauck 19:55:26 07/17/09 (1)
- RE: 20-bit processing - J. Phelan 20:17:18 07/17/09 (0)
- RE: 20-bit processing - Tony Lauck 18:47:12 07/16/09 (4)
- RE: 20-bit processing - J. Phelan 19:12:41 07/16/09 (3)
- Many others ? - Metralla 04:26:22 07/17/09 (2)
- RE: Many others ? - J. Phelan 05:45:14 07/17/09 (1)
- RE: Many others ? - Tony Lauck 20:49:38 07/17/09 (0)