In Reply to: RE: "You are having trouble understanding the nature of data." Right! Like... posted by clarkjohnsen on January 17, 2008 at 23:18:53:
I think you out blah-blah-blah'ed me. OK, I know when I'm beat. If you hear differences between the same digital data stored on two different types of media, bravo. :-)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: "You are having trouble understanding the nature of data." Right! Like... - Scrith 01/19/0800:07:43 01/19/08 (34)
- " If you hear differences between the same digital data stored on two different types of media, bravo." LOL! - clarkjohnsen 00:12:36 01/19/08 (33)
- CD vs. CD-R - Scrith 10:47:15 01/19/08 (28)
- It's jitter - audioengr 12:47:11 01/19/08 (1)
- "It makes the best CD copies I have ever heard. Lowest jitter." Hmmm... - clarkjohnsen 22:44:47 01/20/08 (0)
- RE: CD vs. CD-R - Ted Smith 12:17:32 01/19/08 (25)
- "The problem isn't error free reading of the data." Indeed not. - clarkjohnsen 22:40:12 01/20/08 (20)
- So if it's not just jitter, what do you think it is? (nt) - audioengr 11:54:48 01/21/08 (2)
- Dunno. You're the audioengr. Remember: - clarkjohnsen 12:20:43 01/21/08 (1)
- I dont think so - audioengr 14:25:51 01/21/08 (0)
- RE: "The problem isn't error free reading of the data." Indeed not. - Ted Smith 23:44:11 01/20/08 (16)
- "There appear to be fewer designers who tackle jitter head on." That, plus... - clarkjohnsen 12:13:45 01/21/08 (15)
- RE: "There appear to be fewer designers who tackle jitter head on." That, plus... - Ted Smith 15:18:28 01/21/08 (3)
- "The ultimate difference between reading CDs and CDRs is jitter." OK... that's good to know... - clarkjohnsen 16:25:12 01/21/08 (2)
- RE: "The ultimate difference between reading CDs and CDRs is jitter." OK... that's good to know... - Ted Smith 17:06:48 01/21/08 (1)
- I agree with Ted's assesment 100% - audioengr 19:20:34 01/21/08 (0)
- RE: "There appear to be fewer designers who tackle jitter head on." That, plus... - audioengr 14:29:51 01/21/08 (10)
- "I know exactly why a re-written disk sounds better." Excellent! - clarkjohnsen 16:32:28 01/21/08 (9)
- Piece of cake - audioengr 19:28:57 01/21/08 (1)
- All your explanations are "black magic"... - clarkjohnsen 21:36:44 01/21/08 (0)
- You are confounding things rather than simplifying - Ted Smith 17:28:05 01/21/08 (6)
- No, sir. I was wondering why, if CD players are so great and sometimes cost so much... - clarkjohnsen 17:44:48 01/21/08 (5)
- I was attempting to be careful with my attributions to jitter. - Ted Smith 18:28:39 01/21/08 (4)
- RE: I was attempting to be careful with my attributions to jitter. - Scab 20:20:10 01/21/08 (3)
- RE: I was attempting to be careful with my attributions to jitter. - audioengr 22:21:31 01/21/08 (0)
- There are no guarantees :) - Ted Smith 21:56:45 01/21/08 (1)
- Thank You for Your Response nt - Scab 09:11:55 01/22/08 (0)
- Full Circle! - Scrith 01:54:16 01/20/08 (3)
- Strange circle - Ted Smith 15:27:12 01/20/08 (2)
- Only as strange as people want to make it :-) - Scrith 10:12:32 01/21/08 (1)
- Nah, enjoy your hard disk systems :) - Ted Smith 11:12:17 01/21/08 (0)
- RE: " If you hear differences between the same digital data stored on two different types of media, bravo." LOL! - Ted Smith 10:23:54 01/19/08 (3)
- The "data", as in the bits that portray the music? I realize... - clarkjohnsen 11:10:18 01/19/08 (2)
- RE: The "data", as in the bits that portray the music? I realize... - Ted Smith 11:45:18 01/19/08 (1)
- My reference to DAT was more like an exemplum gratia. nt - clarkjohnsen 18:19:45 01/20/08 (0)