One of the things I’ve realized as I built up my system over the last six months is just how hard it is to review components objectively when you’re on a constant upward path. Every time I make a major upgrade, the new component seems like the greatest thing since sliced bread. It’s surprisingly difficult to find faults in a component that’s significantly better than you’re used to. No matter that you know intellectually that nothing made by man is perfect, it’s surprisingly hard to bring your critical faculties to bear when you’re being “blown awayâ€.This being the case, I decided not to formally review my new Audio Note 4.1x. Rather than try and disguise my enthusiastic ravings under a transparent skin of “objectivity†I think the best thing I can do is post some very preliminary impressions. Please take them for what they are - simply the effusions of a delighted audiophile rather than any kind of canonical pronouncements.
I’ve been using an Audio Note 3.1x Balanced DAC for the last four months. It has been a steadfast musical friend, always living up to my expectations. In that time the rest of the system grew up around it, so I decided to cap my recent audiophile growth with the purchase of a 4.1x Balanced Signature. The new DAC was duly ordered, and in addition to the usual Signature upgrades, Peter Q graced the unit with a design change – replacing the output stage tubes (5687’s) with NOS Telefunken 6463’s. Now I’m no tube maven, so when PQ says these tubes sound much better I figure it’s best to take him at his word. Thanks, Peter.
I picked the DAC up last night, and was able to spend about an hour listening to it. As you can see, these are extremely preliminary impressions, covering only those aspects of the sound that were immediately apparent. I figure the DAC has had a max of 10 hours play between the factory and my dealer's home. Given all the BG caps in it there's a ton of burn-in yet to happen. As time goes by the DAC will settle in and I’ll become more intimately familiar with the sound. For now, I’ll paint the picture with a wide brush and broad strokes.
Right from the get-go, even through cold amps, it outclassed my 3.1x Balanced by a wide margin. My dealer was right in his comment to me yesterday - the Audio Note house sound is there. It shares with its little brother an organic naturalness, a sense of openness and ease. Where they part company is in how fully those traits are expressed. There's a tremendous sense of presence, confidence and eloquence (thanks for the word, Bob) to the sound of the 4.1x.
This seems to be the consequence of a number of characteristics working together. The first one is the utter blackness of the background, from which images stand out as if carved from marble. The second one is the resolution, which gives those images a level of detail I've never experienced before. The third is the complexity of the dynamic shading - macro and micro - that lets the music breathe, and gives an utterly convincing picture of how the musicians are thinking and feeling about their performance. The last one is a remarkable degree of bottom-end extension that gives a very necessary foundation to the music.
All this adds up to a breathtaking sense of realism. I thought my 3.1x was good, and it is. But I'm left with the feeling that while it's a really (really!) good DAC, the 4.1x is more of a musical concierge who whistles up a taxi and sends the musicians home with you :-)
The only characteristic I can hear that I know is going to be ameliorated by burn-in is a wee tinge of hardness in the upper mids. I know that's not the only thing that's going to change over the coming months as the DAC settles in, but for the life of me I can't imagine how it can get much better than this!
Finally, here’s an amusing anecdote. To start the burn-in I had put the transport on repeat last night, and before I headed for work this morning I went in to check on it. I heard the faint sound of music from the system, even though the amps were stone cold. It was coming from the DAC! According to an earlier post by Peter Q on the Asylum, this is an artefact of the transformers resonating. I’d never heard it on my 3.1, but there it was – low volume, high fidelity. I was reminded of Chris Redmond’s flight of fancy back then - tiny musicians living in the box, running frantically to their miniscule microphones as the track index from the CD flashes up on a tiny computer screen.
Living with this piece of gear is going to be one grand musical adventure!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Audio Note 4.1x Balanced Signature - First Impressions - GliderGuider 06:03:31 12/10/03 (81)
- Re: Audio Note 4.1x Balanced Signature - First Impressions - Bob Neill 07:36:15 12/10/03 (20)
- On further reflection - GliderGuider 09:18:03 12/15/03 (0)
- A comment from my dealer on CD vs. SACD - GliderGuider 04:56:06 12/11/03 (10)
- Re: A comment from my dealer on CD vs. SACD - Ted Smith 10:31:44 12/11/03 (9)
- Re: A comment from my dealer on CD vs. SACD - justinsullivan@nc.rr.com 21:48:37 12/18/03 (0)
- He's a man of strong convictions - GliderGuider 10:47:41 12/11/03 (7)
- Re: He's a man of strong convictions - Ted Smith 10:59:50 12/11/03 (6)
- For one the catalog of SACD's is very limited and of the one's there are, how many were recorded at the higher Res? - gme109 18:32:04 12/11/03 (1)
- Re: For one the catalog of SACD's is very limited and of the one's there are, how many were recorded at the higher Res? - Ted Smith 00:19:11 12/12/03 (0)
- Re: He's a man of strong convictions - GliderGuider 11:14:57 12/11/03 (3)
- CD will always be limited .... but - TBone 12:11:31 12/11/03 (2)
- Maybe that is all that is needed for human hearing if . . - John PA 12:29:15 12/11/03 (1)
- I think you could be right - gme109 18:42:56 12/11/03 (0)
- my curiosity got me, too... - kuma 11:09:51 12/10/03 (0)
- Re: Audio Note 4.1x Balanced Signature - First Impressions - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 10:22:53 12/10/03 (4)
- Re: Audio Note 4.1x Balanced Signature - First Impressions - Walter 08:09:41 12/11/03 (3)
- Re: Audio Note 4.1x Balanced Signature - First Impressions - Peter Qvortrup 00:08:36 12/12/03 (0)
- "DVD-A through the Chord"...how is this possible? - Biencfg 19:31:42 12/11/03 (1)
- Re: "DVD-A through the Chord"...how is this possible? - Walter 05:27:49 12/12/03 (0)
- That sounds like a very good idea. - GliderGuider 07:44:11 12/10/03 (1)
- Re: That sounds like a very good idea. - theaudiohobby 09:49:24 12/10/03 (0)
- Re: Audio Note 4.1x Balanced Signature - First Impressions - smargo 07:16:43 12/10/03 (59)
- Re: Audio Note 4.1x Balanced Signature - First Impressions - soulvibrations 11:51:42 12/10/03 (6)
- ? for soulvibrations - rupertdacat 14:39:33 12/10/03 (1)
- Re: ? for soulvibrations - soulvibrations 17:29:05 12/10/03 (0)
- How long will it last? - GliderGuider 12:23:06 12/10/03 (3)
- Re: How long will it last? - soulvibrations 18:18:09 12/10/03 (2)
- Re: How long will it last? - GliderGuider 04:20:51 12/11/03 (1)
- Re: How long will it last? - soulvibrations 05:36:56 12/11/03 (0)
- Re: Audio Note 4.1x Balanced Signature - First Impressions - Bob Neill 10:02:54 12/10/03 (51)
- Re: Audio Note 4.1x Balanced Signature - First Impressions - Peter Qvortrup 00:08:54 12/11/03 (47)
- Re: Audio Note 4.1x Balanced Signature - First Impressions - ddriveman 06:20:56 12/11/03 (1)
- Re: Audio Note 4.1x Balanced Signature - First Impressions - Peter Qvortrup 06:39:46 12/11/03 (0)
- Yeah right!!! - theaudiohobby 04:13:22 12/11/03 (44)
- Re: Yeah right!!! - Peter Qvortrup 05:47:32 12/11/03 (43)
- So SACD is oversampled by default? - carolvs 08:26:39 12/12/03 (2)
- what do you mean by oversampling? - tunenut 09:52:01 12/12/03 (0)
- Re: So SACD is oversampled by default? - Peter Qvortrup 09:07:00 12/12/03 (0)
- this is a pretty biased description - tunenut 17:20:30 12/11/03 (30)
- Re: this is a pretty biased description - Peter Qvortrup 00:19:48 12/12/03 (29)
- Re: this is a pretty biased description - tunenut 09:18:38 12/12/03 (4)
- Re: this is a pretty biased description - Peter Qvortrup 04:59:44 12/13/03 (3)
- thank you for your thoughtful replies - tunenut 12:29:37 12/13/03 (1)
- Re: thank you for your thoughtful replies - Peter Qvortrup 04:26:53 12/14/03 (0)
- Question for Mr. Q - rupertdacat 11:00:49 12/13/03 (0)
- Re: this is a pretty biased description - theaudiohobby 02:56:17 12/12/03 (23)
- Re: this is a pretty biased description - Peter Qvortrup 03:39:27 12/12/03 (22)
- Re: this is a pretty biased description - theaudiohobby 07:32:37 12/12/03 (14)
- Re: this is a pretty biased description - Peter Qvortrup 07:58:59 12/12/03 (13)
- So vinyl replay is not an abstraction eh...you chat crud... - theaudiohobby 08:09:12 12/12/03 (12)
- Re: So vinyl replay is not an abstraction eh...you chat crud... - Peter Qvortrup 08:21:50 12/12/03 (11)
- Re: So vinyl replay is not an abstraction eh...you chat crud... - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 17:05:04 12/14/03 (0)
- Re: So vinyl replay is not an abstraction eh...you chat crud... - theaudiohobby 13:28:08 12/12/03 (9)
- Re: So vinyl replay is not an abstraction eh...you chat crud... - Peter Qvortrup 03:12:43 12/13/03 (8)
- Let me refresh you memory. - theaudiohobby 18:38:20 12/13/03 (7)
- Re: Let me refresh you memory. - Peter Qvortrup 03:08:03 12/14/03 (6)
- Re: Let me refresh you memory. - theaudiohobby 13:26:08 12/14/03 (5)
- You Don't Get to Make the Rules - Bob Neill 13:47:25 12/14/03 (4)
- Re: You Don't Get to Make the Rules - theaudiohobby 01:32:48 12/15/03 (3)
- Re: You Don't Get to Make the Rules - Bob Neill 06:35:37 12/15/03 (2)
- Re: You Don't Get to Make the Rules - theaudiohobby 08:35:59 12/15/03 (1)
- Re: You Don't Get to Make the Rules - Bob Neill 09:03:24 12/15/03 (0)
- Re: this is a pretty biased description - soulvibrations 04:41:55 12/12/03 (6)
- somehow this morphed into analog vs. digital? - tunenut 09:24:29 12/12/03 (0)
- Re: Perhaps not so Biased - Peter Qvortrup 05:04:49 12/12/03 (4)
- Re: Perhaps not so Biased - soulvibrations 05:40:45 12/12/03 (3)
- Re: Perhaps not so Biased - Peter Qvortrup 05:49:35 12/12/03 (2)
- Re: Perhaps not so Biased - soulvibrations 05:56:34 12/12/03 (1)
- Re: Perhaps not so Biased - Peter Qvortrup 09:11:03 12/16/03 (0)
- Hate to disappoint you... - theaudiohobby 11:51:01 12/11/03 (4)
- Re: Hate to disappoint you... - Peter Qvortrup 00:24:30 12/12/03 (3)
- Disagree completely, The word mirage is in the dictionary for good reasons -nt - theaudiohobby 02:47:26 12/12/03 (2)
- Re: Disagree completely, The word mirage is in the dictionary for good reasons -nt - Peter Qvortrup 03:42:53 12/12/03 (1)
- Re: Disagree completely, The word mirage is in the dictionary for good reasons -nt - theaudiohobby 06:53:51 12/12/03 (0)
- Re: Yeah right!!! - larry moore 10:40:35 12/11/03 (3)
- Re: Yeah right!!! - Peter Qvortrup 00:28:32 12/12/03 (2)
- Re: Yeah right!!! - larry moore 13:51:23 12/12/03 (1)
- Re: Yeah right!!! - Peter Qvortrup 09:02:27 12/16/03 (0)
- Re: Audio Note 4.1x Balanced Signature - First Impressions - ddriveman 17:24:42 12/10/03 (2)
- Re: Audio Note 4.1x Balanced Signature - First Impressions - theaudiohobby 04:16:16 12/11/03 (1)
- Consonance SACD 1 & 2 - ddriveman 06:06:56 12/11/03 (0)