In Reply to: Re: Get to the point! posted by Tourist on February 6, 2003 at 18:10:24:
I took no offense. You seemed to be touting the Marantz as better than the Arcam without saying (a) which Marantz model you're referring to and (b) WHY the Marantz would be better. My apologies if I misconstrued your posts.I have listened to an older Marantz only (CD63se or 67). The bass did not seem as deep and clear as the Arcam. I know that some find the midrange to be good with the Marantz, but I actually had the opposite impression. Marantz has a great reputation. A colleague of mine has Marantz, Linn, and CAL cd players (he's a pack rat!). They all have merits.
A lot of it comes down to system matching. The Arcam/Plinius combination is fantastic, in my opinion. I have since found out from the US Plinius distributor, that he also likes this combo.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Get to the point! - cpdunn99 02/7/0309:22:46 02/7/03 (9)
- Re: Get to the point! - Tourist 16:21:21 02/7/03 (8)
- Farellas?! Now were talking! - cpdunn99 10:42:37 02/8/03 (7)
- Re: Farellas?! Now were talking! - Tourist 16:50:36 02/8/03 (6)
- Re: Farellas?! Now were talking! - cpdunn99 08:32:42 02/10/03 (4)
- Re: Farellas?! Now were talking! - Tourist 16:25:39 02/10/03 (3)
- YBA + Dynaudio - cpdunn99 08:35:45 02/11/03 (2)
- Re: YBA + Dynaudio - Tourist 16:21:55 02/11/03 (1)
- Re: YBA + Dynaudio - cpdunn99 11:10:37 02/12/03 (0)
- Re: Farellas?! Now were talking! - Tourist 17:32:54 02/8/03 (0)