In Reply to: RE: Cheap CD Player needed: Marantz or NAD or ? posted by Mushroom Soup on November 23, 2013 at 19:31:53:
I've had mixed luck.
My ORIGINAL 19" Sony Trinitron went probably 20+ years until you could no longer get mechanical tuner parts. And MAN, was it expensive when first purchased.
My '06 Sony SXRD, a 60" rear projector lasted until the filters in the light engine went out……and Sony survived at least 2 class action lawsuits. No mas, for me.
My Sony ICF-2010 All Band receiver? Worth more now than when I bought it and it'll last a LONG time. The best (maybe) hi-tech all band portable ever.
I don't know how long they lasted, but the original 1st gen Sony CD players SOUNDED awful and didn't last.
I hope my PS3 takes after the good stuff…...
Too much is never enough
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Cheap CD Player needed: Marantz or NAD or ? - pictureguy 11/23/1320:33:54 11/23/13 (11)
- RE: Cheap CD Player needed: Marantz or NAD or ? - Crazy Dave 14:43:00 11/25/13 (2)
- RE: Cheap CD Player needed: Marantz or NAD or ? - pictureguy 17:26:58 11/25/13 (1)
- RE: Cheap CD Player needed: Marantz or NAD or ? - Crazy Dave 09:37:02 11/26/13 (0)
- RE: Cheap CD Player needed: Marantz or NAD or ? - Mushroom Soup 11:18:04 11/24/13 (7)
- First CD player? What does that have to do with 2014 - TheBrewmaster 22:58:42 07/31/14 (0)
- RE: Cheap CD Player needed: Marantz or NAD or ? - pictureguy 12:19:42 11/24/13 (5)
- RE: Cheap CD Player needed: Marantz or NAD or ? - Crazy Dave 14:47:31 11/25/13 (2)
- RE: Cheap CD Player needed: Marantz or NAD or ? - pictureguy 17:29:41 11/25/13 (1)
- RE: Cheap CD Player needed: Marantz or NAD or ? - Crazy Dave 09:39:27 11/26/13 (0)
- RE: Cheap CD Player needed: Marantz or NAD or ? - Mushroom Soup 21:45:21 11/24/13 (1)
- RE: Cheap CD Player needed: Marantz or NAD or ? - Tony Lauck 10:08:58 11/25/13 (0)