|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
|
|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
In Reply to: Azur 651C CD player posted by Soundgarden on June 3, 2012 at 08:24:42:
I know this is an oldish thread, but just thought I'd chime in. I use the 651C in my main system, and the CD6004 in the family room. All I can say is, WHATHIFI is out of their minds if they think the Marantz beats the Cambridge. I A/B'd them in my main system, and I can tell you that the extra 300 bucks for the 651C is well worth the money. The Marantz isn't bad at all--it's snappy yet warm, and makes a great player for my secondary system. The Cambridge Audio 651C, however, is much more lush sounding. It's fuller and more holographic, and has a wide soundstage that the Marantz doesn't come close to.
I notice that, for some reason, WHATHIFI seems to love anything Marantz the last few years. Don't get me wrong, the Marantz is a good player, and I love that it's made in Japan, but, IMHO, the Cambridge beats it hands down.
Enjoy the tunes!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Azur 651C CD player - Rischa 08/4/1214:14:01 08/4/12 (1)
- RE: Azur 651C CD player - Soundgarden 22:01:50 08/6/12 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
