In Reply to: Slight disappointment with X26 Pro posted by KanedaK on June 28, 2023 at 00:45:00:
so many things need to be optimized, I often wonder how all these people achieve it (or do they?)
I have never heard a digital cable (coax, AES, USB) that is sufficiently transparent when directly compared to no-wire, I had to devise ways to get rid of any digital cable in signal path. Wish I could achieve the same with analogue cables, but how?
Power conditioning/regeneration/cords affect the sound quite a bit, and it took a lot of effort and time to get close enough.
Providing clean bits, i.e. digital transport/server, is no trivial matter, a Herculean task the deeper you dig.
Add all that to the fact digital is even more sensitive to old school tweaks like footers, vibration control shelves, EMI/RFI controls, fuses, etc, and we have a real task on our hands.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Easy to achieve "good" but for "special" - Jon L 06/29/2313:28:34 06/29/23 (10)
- RE: Easy to achieve "good" but for "special" - KanedaK 23:16:10 06/30/23 (3)
- Some insight into X26 Pro firmware update - AbeCollins 07:43:40 07/2/23 (2)
- RE: Some insight into X26 Pro firmware update - Rad21 09:31:56 07/2/23 (1)
- I don't think so..... - AbeCollins 17:54:01 07/2/23 (0)
- Your Gustard X26Pro vs. Chord Qutest DAC ? - AbeCollins 21:06:51 06/29/23 (1)
- RE: Your Gustard X26Pro vs. Chord Qutest DAC ? - Jon L 14:39:26 06/30/23 (0)
- RE: Easy to achieve "good" but for "special" - Rod M 19:55:18 06/29/23 (3)
- RE: Easy to achieve "good" but for "special" - Jon L 14:41:05 06/30/23 (2)
- I wonder what is wrong? nt - Tre' 13:20:05 07/10/23 (0)
- Still technically a cable! - gusser 12:46:02 07/10/23 (0)