In Reply to: RE: I would suggest some reading on logic and the history of science posted by gusser on April 22, 2019 at 10:48:39:
""It's called an education and many years of experience in electrical engineering.""
And you think that that constitutes EVIDENCE??
You're even more bamboozled than i thought....
""Most of the claims made by these audiophile accessory vendors are in conflict with well proven established theory and practice.""
That is a lie, and I have demonstrated such in previous post. As I stated previously, - these products are highly inspired by, and are almost the SAME THING as long established and proven products in computer networking and the computing industries.
So why did you repeat this again, after i already demonstrated that you are wrong? Why do you continue to assert the same thing, - without offering any counter argument to that point? AHHHH, - because you're religious zealot, a tool of a naysaying pseudo-scientists who also preach and don't follow any principles of good investigation.....
""They can fool the non technical types but not the knowledgeable. Tell me why is the EE community as a whole always against these products""
No one is fooling anyone. The EE community is not "against" these products, - they're used everyday, and enjoy a great following. You should investigate the Intona, EMO Networking isolators, Linear power supplies...
""The only so called "engineers" who support these disputed ideas are those who make and sell the products.""
The only people who dispute these ideas are a few religious zealots who are not researching the products, - and certainly don't understand them.
"Asylums with doors open wide,
Where people had paid to see inside,
For entertainment they watch his body twist
Behind his eyes he says, 'I still exist.'"
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Thank you for proving my point...... - Sordidman 04/22/1910:59:11 04/22/19 (17)
- You have provided evidence of nothing! - gusser 11:06:01 04/22/19 (16)
- Define evidence - Sordidman 11:30:18 04/22/19 (15)
- RE: Define evidence - gusser 11:34:05 04/22/19 (14)
- RE: Define evidence - Sordidman 12:07:46 04/22/19 (13)
- RE: Define evidence - gusser 12:14:51 04/22/19 (12)
- RE: Define evidence - Sordidman 12:37:17 04/22/19 (11)
- LOL! - gusser 12:43:59 04/22/19 (10)
- RE: LOL! - Sordidman 12:57:15 04/22/19 (9)
- What experience? - gusser 14:01:41 04/22/19 (8)
- RE: What experience? - Sordidman 14:24:04 04/22/19 (7)
- For your use I agree (nt) - gusser 14:54:56 04/22/19 (6)
- Again, not me. For high performance, digital file playback use - Sordidman 15:35:54 04/22/19 (5)
- Right! I don't have high performance digital playback! - gusser 15:53:41 04/22/19 (4)
- RE: Right! I don't have high performance digital playback! - Sordidman 16:21:40 04/22/19 (3)
- Vitriol - audioengr 10:42:36 06/6/19 (0)
- Your system. - gusser 16:56:37 04/22/19 (0)
- RE: Right! I don't have high performance digital playback! - gusser 16:27:52 04/22/19 (0)