In Reply to: RE: I would suggest some reading on logic and the history of science posted by gusser on April 20, 2019 at 15:27:11:
""So again what is your technical or scientific background?""
Is there one needed? Is it not possible to follow the scientific method without technical degrees? Is a speculation from a chemical scientist more valuable here than an experienced evidence gathering listener who has engaged comparative analysis and research?
Your wild claim that none of these products can possibly work is based on what evidence? Are you just blindly following other mad speculators?
""Just because some audiophile rag states a technical claim you believe it?""
Do you have a quote from an audiophile "rag" that you'd like post? Do you have any evidence of someone making a "technical claim." Just because some EE in an unrelated area shouts some crazy speculating remarks about audiophile products in general, - (absent of any EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER), you're going to believe them?
Anytime your "so called" scientists render an opinion about anything, - they are somehow more reliable and trustworthy over anybody else, - even if they have no evidence, have not researched, and have done no testing?
Yes, - you need help understanding the difference between science, and then speculative opinions: heresay from a few naysayers.
Underlying any scientific investigation is curiosity: you should be asking yourself, - "why does almost everyone who uses these products, assert that they are effective? What tests can I run that would either prove or disprove their effectiveness? What is inside these boxes, and how do they work?
You stand with the religious zealots, who are shouting "the sun revolves around the earth," forming opinions about so much you are unwilling to investigate. This is zealotry and cult-of-personality charlatanism.
"Asylums with doors open wide,
Where people had paid to see inside,
For entertainment they watch his body twist
Behind his eyes he says, 'I still exist.'"
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: I would suggest some reading on logic and the history of science - Sordidman 04/22/1910:41:39 04/22/19 (19)
- RE: I would suggest some reading on logic and the history of science - gusser 10:48:39 04/22/19 (18)
- Thank you for proving my point...... - Sordidman 10:59:11 04/22/19 (17)
- You have provided evidence of nothing! - gusser 11:06:01 04/22/19 (16)
- Define evidence - Sordidman 11:30:18 04/22/19 (15)
- RE: Define evidence - gusser 11:34:05 04/22/19 (14)
- RE: Define evidence - Sordidman 12:07:46 04/22/19 (13)
- RE: Define evidence - gusser 12:14:51 04/22/19 (12)
- RE: Define evidence - Sordidman 12:37:17 04/22/19 (11)
- LOL! - gusser 12:43:59 04/22/19 (10)
- RE: LOL! - Sordidman 12:57:15 04/22/19 (9)
- What experience? - gusser 14:01:41 04/22/19 (8)
- RE: What experience? - Sordidman 14:24:04 04/22/19 (7)
- For your use I agree (nt) - gusser 14:54:56 04/22/19 (6)
- Again, not me. For high performance, digital file playback use - Sordidman 15:35:54 04/22/19 (5)
- Right! I don't have high performance digital playback! - gusser 15:53:41 04/22/19 (4)
- RE: Right! I don't have high performance digital playback! - Sordidman 16:21:40 04/22/19 (3)
- Vitriol - audioengr 10:42:36 06/6/19 (0)
- Your system. - gusser 16:56:37 04/22/19 (0)
- RE: Right! I don't have high performance digital playback! - gusser 16:27:52 04/22/19 (0)