In Reply to: Re: "By moving the crossover point from 22.05 to 88.2kHz, 96kHz ... posted by Craig Luna on March 13, 2001 at 17:30:13:
Dear Craig,The assumption that we can somehow know what the musical signal was "before" and then be able to correct (or should I say reinstate?) it "after" is just plain nonsense, there is no servo system fast enough to correct any of this within the real time time domain, no matter how much processing power is available.
Musical signals contain such a myriad of ever changing information that all attempts measure - predict and then to "contain" it within the even the most sophisticated digital technology available today is futile and the belief that "we are nearly there" only contributes to prevent further research into the subject.
Because time waits for no-one and the sooner we realise this the better we will become at solving the real problems in music reproduction.
Sincerely,
Peter Qvortrup
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: "By moving the crossover point from 22.05 to 88.2kHz, 96kHz ... - Peter Qvortrup 03/14/0105:39:15 03/14/01 (6)
- Re: "By moving the crossover point from 22.05 to 88.2kHz, 96kHz ... - Craig Luna 15:08:45 03/14/01 (5)
- Re: "By moving the crossover point from 22.05 to 88.2kHz, 96kHz ... - Peter Qvortrup 05:09:00 03/15/01 (4)
- Re: "By moving the crossover point from 22.05 to 88.2kHz, 96kHz ... - Craig Luna 08:01:57 03/15/01 (3)
- Re: "By moving the crossover point from 22.05 to 88.2kHz, 96kHz ... - Peter Qvortrup 08:57:31 03/15/01 (2)
- Re: "By moving the crossover point from 22.05 to 88.2kHz, 96kHz ... - Craig Luna 22:32:22 03/15/01 (1)
- Re: "By moving the crossover point from 22.05 to 88.2kHz, 96kHz ... - Peter Qvortrup 16:17:34 03/17/01 (0)