In Reply to: Upsampling is just a marketing hype posted by Panda KO on March 12, 2001 at 22:13:08:
Listen to some upsampling DACs before judging. Best explanation I read about upsampling is by Robert Harley in his book "The Complete Guide to High End Audio".Since I can't post at full text at verbatum of the copyrighed material, let me paraphrase his explanation in a few sentences.
Digital filters in CD Players pass the full bandwidth (20-20kHz) of audio spectrum and yet attenuate the signal by 96dB at 22.05kHz. That is a whopping 96dB attenuation within a spectrum of 2.05kHz. Digital filters do introduce distortion in time domain by smearing transients. Combine this distortion with the distortion of very steep crossover filter, you have significant audible impact on the audible spectrum.
By moving the crossover point from 22.05 to 88.2kHz, 96kHz or 192kHz, digital filters can be much more gentle over a wide spectrum (less steep) well beyond the audible spectrum. Such filters introduce far less time smear and are less harmful.
By getting rid of the filter designed for 44.1kHz reproduction, our conventional CD now has dramatically increased transparency, space, treble smoothness, resolution, and harmonic accuracy. Note that no new musical information is created by upsampling; the sonic benefit is conferred solely by using a more benign digital filter.
Adi
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Simple explanation - Adi 03/13/0112:04:57 03/13/01 (31)
- "By moving the crossover point from 22.05 to 88.2kHz, 96kHz ... - Todd Krieger 16:43:08 03/13/01 (12)
- Re: "By moving the crossover point from 22.05 to 88.2kHz, 96kHz ... - Adi 18:36:42 03/13/01 (0)
- Re: "By moving the crossover point from 22.05 to 88.2kHz, 96kHz ... - Craig Luna 17:30:13 03/13/01 (10)
- Re: "By moving the crossover point from 22.05 to 88.2kHz, 96kHz ... - Daniel Espley 16:01:47 03/15/01 (0)
- Re: "By moving the crossover point from 22.05 to 88.2kHz, 96kHz ... - Peter Qvortrup 05:39:15 03/14/01 (6)
- Re: "By moving the crossover point from 22.05 to 88.2kHz, 96kHz ... - Craig Luna 15:08:45 03/14/01 (5)
- Re: "By moving the crossover point from 22.05 to 88.2kHz, 96kHz ... - Peter Qvortrup 05:09:00 03/15/01 (4)
- Re: "By moving the crossover point from 22.05 to 88.2kHz, 96kHz ... - Craig Luna 08:01:57 03/15/01 (3)
- Re: "By moving the crossover point from 22.05 to 88.2kHz, 96kHz ... - Peter Qvortrup 08:57:31 03/15/01 (2)
- Re: "By moving the crossover point from 22.05 to 88.2kHz, 96kHz ... - Craig Luna 22:32:22 03/15/01 (1)
- Re: "By moving the crossover point from 22.05 to 88.2kHz, 96kHz ... - Peter Qvortrup 16:17:34 03/17/01 (0)
- HDCD - Werner 03:18:09 03/14/01 (1)
- Re: HDCD - Craig Luna 13:56:58 03/14/01 (0)
- Re: Simple explanation - Daniel Espley 15:56:42 03/13/01 (0)
- Re: Simple explanation - Peter Qvortrup 13:49:58 03/13/01 (16)
- Re: Simple explanation - Craig Luna 17:31:34 03/14/01 (5)
- Re: Simple explanation - Peter Qvortrup 05:03:49 03/15/01 (4)
- Re: Simple explanation - Craig Luna 08:04:16 03/15/01 (3)
- Re: Simple explanation - -Steve 14:51:52 03/15/01 (1)
- Re: Simple explanation - Craig Luna 20:24:35 03/15/01 (0)
- Re: Simple explanation - Peter Qvortrup 09:02:51 03/15/01 (0)
- Re: Simple explanation - garth 16:21:14 03/13/01 (8)
- Re: Simple explanation - Peter Qvortrup 03:35:37 03/14/01 (7)
- Re: Simple explanation - Craig Luna 17:58:55 03/14/01 (1)
- Re: Simple explanation - Peter Qvortrup 05:12:55 03/15/01 (0)
- And therein lies the rub..... - Chris Garrett 12:38:48 03/14/01 (4)
- Re: And therein lies the rub..... - Peter Qvortrup 11:12:03 03/15/01 (0)
- Relating to your last point..... - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 14:07:58 03/14/01 (2)
- Re: Relating to your last point..... - Bob Bales 09:42:26 03/18/01 (0)
- It will be interesting..... - Chris Garrett 14:28:34 03/14/01 (0)
- You know, I`m sure somebody already does this......[nt] - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 14:36:05 03/13/01 (0)