|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
|
|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
In Reply to: Re: a decent paper indeed posted by Daniel Espley on February 27, 2001 at 13:55:14:
> > There's nothing wrong with upsampling < <I believe there is something wrong with upsampling. It's too complicated. Any benefit achievable through upsampling in a DAC can be more efficiently and effectively implemented with I2S connection, oversampling and dither. And these avoid the questionable algorithms required for non-integer conversion.
If upsampling were done in multiples of 44.1, I'd be far less skeptical of their reasoning. Why convert to 96 instead of 88.2 kHz, or 192 instead of 176.4 kHz? The only reason that makes sense to me is that they are trying to capitalize on the popularity of the true higher sampling rate mediums, DVD and DVD-A.
Dan Bonhomme
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: a decent paper indeed - Audio Fan 02/28/0109:35:53 02/28/01 (3)
- Re: a decent paper indeed - Daniel Espley 13:51:56 02/28/01 (2)
- Thanks Dan. - Audio Fan 18:20:05 02/28/01 (1)
- Re: Thanks Dan. - Daniel Espley 02:54:46 03/1/01 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
