|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
|
|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
In Reply to: Re: a decent paper indeed posted by Daniel Espley on February 27, 2001 at 13:55:14:
Posted by Daniel Espley on February 27, 2001 at 13:55:14:
In Reply to: Re: a decent paper indeed posted by Audio Fan on February 26, 2001 at 14:03:11:
Hi 'Fan,
There's nothing wrong with upsampling - it has a legitimate use, and is an effective jitter reducer depending on how well it is implemented. I think the trouble perhaps started when someone supposed that, for instance, upsamling to 96KHz improved transient response to the equivalent of true 96KHz data. DCS have done nothing to discourage this myth, mind. Why would they?Dan
Partially true but dCS has consistently stated that upsampled data is not "true" 96 or 192 sampled data and that in fact there is no difference in the frequency response comparing the original to the upsampled. The differences are in the filters used and they provide a choice of six.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: a decent paper indeed - garth 02/28/0103:40:07 02/28/01 (3)
- Re: a decent paper indeed - Daniel Espley 13:32:10 02/28/01 (2)
- Re: a decent paper indeed - garth 03:19:45 03/1/01 (1)
- Re: a decent paper indeed - Audio Fan 11:00:55 03/1/01 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
