|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
|
|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
In Reply to: Re: personally, I'm waiting for a Fourier based upsampler to 88.2kHz posted by Rodney Gold on February 21, 2001 at 23:46:54:
Thus, the original data isn't seen at the output. 88.2 would. That's all I'm saying. How can you say data that goes in every 22.7 m s & go out every 10.4 m s? The original points don't go out. The original point's interpretation leaves but not the actual data.
....just my 2¢
» Mart £ «
Planar Asylum
where the speakers are thin but the music is anything but
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- 44.1 isn't compatible with 96 - Mart 02/22/0100:27:43 02/22/01 (10)
- Re: 44.1 isn't compatible with 96 - Rodney Gold 02:45:42 02/22/01 (9)
- Re: 44.1 isn't compatible with 96 - garth 08:21:25 02/25/01 (0)
- Re: 44.1 isn't compatible with 96 - Craig Luna 11:25:59 02/22/01 (0)
- it does. - Werner 07:02:36 02/22/01 (4)
- Perhaps I'm not being clear here - Rodney Gold 08:35:24 02/22/01 (3)
- so, now you're right :-) - Werner 08:42:19 02/22/01 (2)
- Bullseye.... - -Steve 18:24:38 02/22/01 (1)
- It's all in the algorythm - Mart 22:09:23 02/22/01 (0)
- it is much more complex than that, but 10 & 20 should still exist - Mart 03:26:38 02/22/01 (0)
- So what's inserted according to you then ? nt - rbroer 03:17:34 02/22/01 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
