In Reply to: RE: lossless protocol implementation posted by bullethead on October 26, 2017 at 03:38:17:
Hi BH,
No I'm not familiar with her work. A brief glance at her website showed that she is on top of a lot of topics. It is popularly called the "truther" movement, as the internet allows the free sharing of actual information, rather than the propaganda that is pounded into us by the mainstream media and our corrupt government.
The microwave thing doesn't take too much digging to figure out. Just from first principles, it only makes sense that almost any change from the environment in which we have been living in for 500 million years as homo sapiens, and billions of years as organic life would be a risky thing to do. Heck, even breathing pure oxygen will damage your lungs after 24 hours or so.
There is almost no natural sources of radiation below the infrared - even man-made fires which we've been using for hundreds of millions of years. In contrast, our time spent in buildings or cars which allow the transmission of visible light unfortunately blocks infrared quite effective - which is why greenhouses work. This means that our eyes and skin receive far less IR exposure than they were designed for. Hence many people use wide-spectrum lighting to simulate the sun's natural spectrum more closely. When Li-Fi takes over, it will supply the IR radiation we don't get while indoors. There won't be any deleterious effects from microwaves, and the bandwidth potential is mind-boggling.
Li-Fi today is about at the same stage as all-electric cars 20 years ago. I hope it doesn't take that long to switch over, but the past and present FCC heads are eager to ram 5G down our throats. One can easily look up all kinds of information on both 5G and microwaves, but most people simply don't want to hear about it because they like the convenience of wireless devices.
![]()
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: lossless protocol implementation - Charles Hansen 10/26/1705:50:08 10/26/17 (2)
- RE: lossless protocol implementation - bullethead 06:05:40 10/26/17 (1)
- RE: lossless protocol implementation - Charles Hansen 06:32:55 10/26/17 (0)