In Reply to: RE: One Interesting Point posted by PAR on October 24, 2017 at 03:59:16:
> > Perhaps I am missing something < <If you don't go to YouTube, you have probably missed out on a recent phenomenon whereby there are many, many people claiming that A = 440 sounds wrong, but that A = 432 sounds far better. (Just type "A=432" in the YouTube search box to see hundreds of videos on this.) But Moffat said A = 432 is *not* right, it *must* be C = 256.
My point is that even *if* you believe in this theory, the difference between A = 432 and C = 256 is minute and it's hard for me to imagine it would make much of a difference. I'll link to one that explores it and also debunks it. Kind of entertaining...
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: One Interesting Point - Charles Hansen 10/24/1717:10:55 10/24/17 (4)
- For what it's worth - Frihed89 02:28:02 10/25/17 (0)
- RE: One Interesting Point - PAR 22:54:19 10/24/17 (2)
- Modern Instruments couldn't possibly tune to A 432. It's hard enough keeping 440 without going sharp. - oldmkvi 07:26:13 10/25/17 (0)
- RE: One Interesting Point - Charles Hansen 03:08:39 10/25/17 (0)