In Reply to: RE: To me, Sue, high-end, can only be about coherent 3D recordings of acoustic music. posted by cpmavrick on November 2, 2018 at 05:40:40:
> Like your comment on Bob Carver, "it doesn't actually make sense.",
> well explain why, show us the technical data of why.
The tests Mr. Carver described don't support his assertion that the MQA
files initially supplied to reviewers were processed with something similar
to a Sonic Holograph generator. As I wrote but you seemed to have missed,
I am performing an appropriate test myself and will report my findings.
> Links, why, its my opinion and others on how you protect MQA.
In other words, you've got nothing, just unsupported assertions :-)
John Atkinson
Technical Editor, Stereophile
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: To me, Sue, high-end, can only be about coherent 3D recordings of acoustic music. - John Atkinson 11/2/1807:54:42 11/2/18 (4)
- RE: To me, Sue, high-end, can only be about coherent 3D recordings of acoustic music. - cpmavrick 14:38:26 11/3/18 (3)
- RE: To me, Sue, high-end, can only be about coherent 3D recordings of acoustic music. - John Atkinson 13:00:22 11/4/18 (2)
- RE: To me, Sue, high-end, can only be about coherent 3D recordings of acoustic music. - Krav Maga 20:36:12 11/4/18 (1)
- RE: To me, Sue, high-end, can only be about coherent 3D recordings of acoustic music. - John Atkinson 07:56:24 11/5/18 (0)