In Reply to: RE: Fascinating that MQA re-invented the . . . posted by Ryan Berry on August 20, 2018 at 19:38:37:
> While you may feel that MQA's implementation of a similar technology to
> Ayre's Minimum-Phase filter is an unexpected tribute to Charley, John, I in
> all due respect must disagree. If MQA threatens the availability of music
> in any other format, then the technology remains a direct slap in the face
> of everything Charley spent the vast majority of his life working towards.Appreciate the response, Ryan. We did examine the DRM aspect of MQA in
an earlier Stereophile article; in the article being discussed, I was only
examining the time-domain behavior of A/D converters - in that context my
tribute to Charley was that the QA-9's Listen filter and the experimental
complementary filter for the QX-5 do what MQA is claimed to do.But as you point out in another posting, commercially available recordings
made with the QA-9's Listen filter are extremely rare. More's the pity.
John Atkinson
Technical Editor, Stereophile
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Fascinating that MQA re-invented the . . . - John Atkinson 08/21/1804:27:46 08/21/18 (2)
- RE: Fascinating that MQA re-invented the . . . - Ryan Berry 09:22:34 08/21/18 (1)
- Thank you for making that point... it seems completely lost on JA [nt] - Steve Cortez 04:41:12 08/23/18 (0)