In Reply to: RE: Stereophile sold - and posted by SpotcheckBilly12345 on March 24, 2018 at 09:37:23:
> JA, when it all shakes out your (Stereophile's) readers and subscribers
> will be happy if the magazine stays the way it is!
Thanks SpotCheckBilly. HiFiNews's owners bought us because of what we
are, not because of what we could be turned into.
John Atkinson
Technical Editor, Stereophile
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Stereophile sold - and - John Atkinson 03/24/1814:58:36 03/24/18 (15)
- RE: Stereophile sold - and - fmak 01:28:48 03/25/18 (0)
- Don't kid yourself... it always boils down to a number$ game. They're not a charity [nt] - Steve Cortez 22:00:57 03/24/18 (13)
- Which is why they bought a successful magazine. nt - oldmkvi 22:11:14 03/24/18 (12)
- That's how the acquisition game is played... - Ivan303 08:48:03 03/25/18 (10)
- McIntosh is doing better than ever- nt - oldmkvi 01:55:54 03/26/18 (4)
- That's likely because they didn't end up getting purchased by... - Ivan303 07:16:43 03/28/18 (3)
- RE: That's likely because they didn't end up getting purchased by... - BubbaMike 13:05:10 03/28/18 (2)
- RE: That's likely because they didn't end up getting purchased by... - SpotcheckBilly12345 13:34:49 03/28/18 (1)
- Certainly he was actively running the business - Ivan303 17:33:48 03/28/18 (0)
- Squeeze what? - Rick W 10:13:27 03/25/18 (4)
- Wel, cut editorial spending, for one thing.... - Ivan303 15:13:19 03/25/18 (3)
- "Editorial" spending? They already pay reviewers chickenshit. - Rick W 20:42:49 03/25/18 (2)
- RE: "Editorial" spending? They already pay reviewers chickenshit. - Ivan303 21:18:50 03/25/18 (1)
- Ahh, slim to none. nt - Rick W 13:29:59 03/26/18 (0)
- Successful today doesn't mean they won't make changes to increase top-line and margins... - Steve Cortez 23:04:07 03/24/18 (0)