|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
|
|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
In Reply to: RE: Why do you care that I care? posted by stehno on December 15, 2017 at 18:40:15:
> If I interpret mkuller's statement above correctly and his obvious trust in
> Atkinson, I suspect he also thinks MQA's performance is like "experiencing
> the birth of a new world".
Please stop misrepresenting what I wrote 3 years ago. As I explained to "regmac"
a couple of days ago, my "birth of a new world" was not specifically about
MQA's sound quality. While this was indeed excellent in the December 2014
demonstration, the first part of the "new world" I mentioned in the
article's title involved the benefit MQA encoding offered streaming.
Second, the more general point was that MQA's approach to digital audio
data encoding, reducing all the stages between the input of the A/D
converter to the output of the D/A converter to a transparent "pipe," was
a back-to-first-principles approach that I found elegant in the extreme.
John Atkinson
Technical Editor, Stereophile
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Why do you care that I care? - John Atkinson 12/16/1711:04:27 12/16/17 (1)
- RE: Why do you care that I care? - stehno 01:28:42 12/17/17 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]