In Reply to: MQA Technical Analysis/Hypothesis Paper posted by 4everyoung on November 24, 2017 at 15:35:38:
> Spoiler alert: Despite all the testing and guessing, MQA is still a closed
> loop proprietary system.
I am not sure if anyone has claimed it isn't.
Thanks for the link.
John Atkinson
Technical Editor, Stereophile
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: MQA Technical Analysis/Hypothesis Paper - John Atkinson 11/25/1707:59:17 11/25/17 (14)
- Anyone else... - Steve Cortez 04:51:02 11/27/17 (13)
- Capable? Sure. - Jim Austin 06:52:13 11/27/17 (12)
- Stereophile's upcoming MQA technical articles are nothing but a red herring... - stehno 18:47:54 11/27/17 (4)
- RE: Stereophile's upcoming MQA technical articles are nothing but a red herring... - John Atkinson 09:29:07 11/28/17 (2)
- RE: Stereophile's upcoming MQA technical articles are nothing but a red herring... - stehno 22:33:47 11/28/17 (1)
- RE: Stereophile's upcoming MQA technical articles are nothing but a red herring... - John Atkinson 08:40:11 11/29/17 (0)
- RE: Stereophile's upcoming MQA technical articles are nothing but a red herring... - Mr_Steady 06:20:51 11/28/17 (0)
- Huh? - Charles Hansen 12:28:10 11/27/17 (0)
- Guess it took you around a month to understand, eh? - Rick W 09:05:14 11/27/17 (2)
- RE: Guess it took you around a month to understand, eh? - Jim Austin 09:13:51 11/27/17 (1)
- RE: Guess it took you around a month to understand, eh? - 4everyoung 16:21:21 11/27/17 (0)
- Are you suggesting... - 4everyoung 08:41:03 11/27/17 (2)
- I meant what I wrote - Jim Austin 08:43:34 11/27/17 (1)
- Let's try tthis one again - 4everyoung 10:14:15 11/27/17 (0)