In Reply to: RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? posted by Krav Maga on November 20, 2017 at 17:49:47:
> I don't believe that the January "2018" issue of Stereophile has been
> released yet. Did you mean some other year?
> Oh, I get it, you're trolling rt66indierock.
"rt66indierock" denied that the negative comments about Jim Austin and his
article were an example of "framing" the argument ahead of the article's
publication. So I was gently pointing out that as the article he was
criticizing had yet to be published, "framing" was all he could be doing.
John Atkinson
Technical Editor, Stereophile
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - John Atkinson 11/21/1704:15:45 11/21/17 (7)
- RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - Charles Hansen 10:47:24 11/21/17 (6)
- RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - John Atkinson 14:08:51 11/21/17 (5)
- RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - Krav Maga 22:49:35 11/21/17 (3)
- RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - Charles Hansen 15:14:50 11/22/17 (2)
- RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - stehno 00:07:23 11/26/17 (1)
- RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - John Atkinson 08:28:18 11/26/17 (0)
- RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - Charles Hansen 19:00:37 11/21/17 (0)