In Reply to: RE: Dear Jim Austin, posted by John Atkinson on November 16, 2017 at 05:07:07:
> Okay, so what specific criticisms do you have to make about Jim's first
> article examining MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of
> Stereophile?
4 days later: "crickets"
John Atkinson
Technical Editor, Stereophile
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Dear Jim Austin, - John Atkinson 11/20/1716:49:28 11/20/17 (12)
- Tell me about the crickets, John. I'm still awaiting your response 2 years later. - stehno 22:56:02 11/20/17 (2)
- RE: Tell me about the crickets, John. I'm still awaiting your response 2 years later. - John Atkinson 11:57:25 11/21/17 (1)
- Your endorsements seem more like those of an easily excitable kid in a candy store... - stehno 13:48:18 11/25/17 (0)
- RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - Krav Maga 17:49:47 11/20/17 (8)
- RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - John Atkinson 04:15:45 11/21/17 (7)
- RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - Charles Hansen 10:47:24 11/21/17 (6)
- RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - John Atkinson 14:08:51 11/21/17 (5)
- RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - Krav Maga 22:49:35 11/21/17 (3)
- RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - Charles Hansen 15:14:50 11/22/17 (2)
- RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - stehno 00:07:23 11/26/17 (1)
- RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - John Atkinson 08:28:18 11/26/17 (0)
- RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - Charles Hansen 19:00:37 11/21/17 (0)