In Reply to: RE: Dear Jim Austin, posted by rt66indierock on November 15, 2017 at 11:48:03:
> Sorry John I'm not using that tactic.
Okay, so what specific criticisms do you have to make about Jim's first
article examining MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of
Stereophile?
John Atkinson
Technical Editor, Stereophile
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Dear Jim Austin, - John Atkinson 11/16/1705:07:07 11/16/17 (13)
- RE: Dear Jim Austin, - John Atkinson 16:49:28 11/20/17 (12)
- Tell me about the crickets, John. I'm still awaiting your response 2 years later. - stehno 22:56:02 11/20/17 (2)
- RE: Tell me about the crickets, John. I'm still awaiting your response 2 years later. - John Atkinson 11:57:25 11/21/17 (1)
- Your endorsements seem more like those of an easily excitable kid in a candy store... - stehno 13:48:18 11/25/17 (0)
- RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - Krav Maga 17:49:47 11/20/17 (8)
- RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - John Atkinson 04:15:45 11/21/17 (7)
- RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - Charles Hansen 10:47:24 11/21/17 (6)
- RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - John Atkinson 14:08:51 11/21/17 (5)
- RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - Krav Maga 22:49:35 11/21/17 (3)
- RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - Charles Hansen 15:14:50 11/22/17 (2)
- RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - stehno 00:07:23 11/26/17 (1)
- RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - John Atkinson 08:28:18 11/26/17 (0)
- RE: MQA's claims, published in the January 2018 issue of Stereophile? - Charles Hansen 19:00:37 11/21/17 (0)