Home Critic's Corner

Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry.

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] Thread: [ Display  All  Email ] [ Critic's Corner ] [ Return to Search Results ]
[ Alert Moderator ]

RE: "MQA is presented as an improvement in sound quality"

> John, I've looked at your web traffic the last six months and subscription
> data. I don't see how what you have published about MQA has had any impact
> on Stereophile.

Stereophile typically gets 3.5-4 million page view per month from up
to 700,000 unique visitors. I suppose I could use Google Analytics to
extract the impact of our MQA coverage from those totals, but to be
honest, I don't see the point.

> As for the listening evaluations you have done I don't see any indication
> these evaluations were volume matched.

They were level-matched.

John Atkinson
Technical Editor, Stereophile

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Amplified Parts  

Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups
FAQ

Post a Message!

 Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.

[ Top Top of Page ] [ Contact Us ] [ Support/Wish List ] [ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
[ General ] [ Speakers ] [ Tubes ] [ Vinyl ] [ Digital ] [ Hi-Rez ] [ Video Asylum ] [ Cables ] [ Tweaks/DIY ] [ Music ] [ Films ]